0 avis
Reasoning about death in biomedical decision-making
Article indépendant
Depending on our mode of reasoning-moral, prudential, instrumental, empirical, dialectical, and so on-we may come to vastly different conclusions on the nature of death and the appropriate orientation toward matters such as euthanasia or procuring organs from brain-dead patients. These differing orientations have resulted in some of the most enduring conflicts in biomedical decision-making with roots in the earliest strands of philosophical discourse. Through continually grappling with questions over matters of death, we continually step closer to clarity, even if certainty on these matters remains necessarily as elusive as death itself.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhac009
Voir la revue «The journal of medicine and philosophy, 47»
Autres numéros de la revue «The journal of medicine and philosophy»