Depression and physician-aid-in-dying

Article indépendant

TULLY, Ian

In this paper, I address the question of whether it is ever permissible to grant a request for physician-aid-in-dying (PAD) from an individual suffering from treatment-resistant depression. I assume for the sake of argument that PAD is sometimes permissible. There are three requirements for PAD: suffering, prognosis, and competence. First, an individual must be suffering from an illness or injury which is sufficient to cause serious, ongoing hardship. Second, one must have exhausted effective treatment options, and one's prospects for recovery must be poor. Third, the individual must be judged competent to request PAD. I argue that many cases of treatment-resistant depression meet the first two requirements. Thus, the key question concerns the third. I consider four features of depression that might compromise a person's decision-making capacity. Ultimately, I conclude that PAD requests from depressed patients can be permissibly granted in some circumstances.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhac004

Voir la revue «The journal of medicine and philosophy, 47»

Autres numéros de la revue «The journal of medicine and philosophy»

• Description
• Sujet/Public
• Outil
• Outil d'anticipation
• Gestion