Argumentation in end-of-life conversations with families in Dutch intensive care units : a qualitative observational study

Article indépendant

AKKERMANS, Aranka | PRINS, Sanne | SPIJKERS, Amber S. | WAGEMANS, Jean | LABRIE, Nanon H. M. | WILLEMS, Dick L. | SCHULTZ, Marcus J. | CHERPANATH, Thomas G. V. | VAN WOENSEL, Job B. M. | VAN HEERDE, Marc | VAN KAAM, Anton H. | VAN DE LOO, Moniek | STIGGELBOUT, Anne | SMETS, Ellen M. A. | DE VOS, Mirjam A.

PURPOSE: In intensive care units (ICUs), decisions about the continuation or discontinuation of life-sustaining treatment (LST) are made on a daily basis. Professional guidelines recommend an open exchange of standpoints and underlying arguments between doctors and families to arrive at the most appropriate decision. Yet, it is still largely unknown how doctors and families argue in real-life conversations. This study aimed to (1) identify which arguments doctors and families use in support of standpoints to continue or discontinue LST, (2) investigate how doctors and families structure their arguments, and (3) explore how their argumentative practices unfold during conversations. METHOD: A qualitative inductive thematic analysis of 101 audio-recorded conversations between doctors and families. RESULTS: Seventy-one doctors and the families of 36 patients from the neonatal, pediatric, and adult ICU (respectively, N-ICU, P-ICU, and A-ICU) of a large university-based hospital participated. In almost all conversations, doctors were the first to argue and families followed, thereby either countering the doctor's line of argumentation or substantiating it. Arguments put forward by doctors and families fell under one of ten main types. The types of arguments presented by families largely overlapped with those presented by doctors. A real exchange of arguments occurred in a minority of conversations and was generally quite brief in the sense that not all possible arguments were presented and then discussed together. CONCLUSION: This study offers a detailed insight in the argumentation practices of doctors and families, which can help doctors to have a sharper eye for the arguments put forward by doctors and families and to offer room for true deliberation.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07027-6

Voir la revue «Intensive care medicine, 49»

Autres numéros de la revue «Intensive care medicine»

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

How doctors manage conflicts with families of...

Article indépendant | SPIJKERS, Amber S. | Intensive care medicine | vol.48

Purpose: Intensive care is a stressful environment in which team-family conflicts commonly occur. If managed poorly, conflicts can have negative effects on all parties involved. Previous studies mainly investigated these conflicts...

Diversity of parent emotions and physician re...

Article indépendant | PRINS, Sanne | Pediatrics

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To provide support to parents of critically ill children, it is important that physicians adequately respond to parents' emotions. In this study, we investigated emotions expressed by parents, physicians...

How doctors actually (do not) involve familie...

Article | AKKERMANS, Aranka | PALLIATIVE MEDICINE | n°10 | vol.35

BACKGROUND: Intensive care doctors have to find the right balance between sharing crucial decisions with families of patients on the one hand and not overburdening them on the other hand. This requires a tailored approach instead ...

De la même série

Argumentation in end-of-life conversations wi...

Article indépendant | AKKERMANS, Aranka | Intensive care medicine | n°4 | vol.49

PURPOSE: In intensive care units (ICUs), decisions about the continuation or discontinuation of life-sustaining treatment (LST) are made on a daily basis. Professional guidelines recommend an open exchange of standpoints and under...

Differences in directives to limit treatment ...

Article indépendant | BURNS, Karen E. A. | Intensive care medicine | vol.49

Purpose: The aim of this study was to characterize differences in directives to limit treatments and discontinue invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in elderly (65–80 years) and very elderly (> 80 years) intensive care unit (ICU...

The impact of religion on changes in end-of-l...

Article indépendant | SCHEFOLD, Joerg C. | Intensive care medicine | vol.49

Purpose: Religious beliefs affect end-of-life practices in intensive care units (ICUs). Changes over time in end-of-life practices were not investigated regarding religions. Methods: Twenty-two European ICUs (3 regions: Northern, ...

How doctors manage conflicts with families of...

Article indépendant | SPIJKERS, Amber S. | Intensive care medicine | vol.48

Purpose: Intensive care is a stressful environment in which team-family conflicts commonly occur. If managed poorly, conflicts can have negative effects on all parties involved. Previous studies mainly investigated these conflicts...

Sedation practice and discomfort during withd...

Article indépendant | ROBERT, Rene | Intensive care medicine | n°6 | vol.46

Purpose: Little is known on the incidence of discomfort during the end-of-life of intensive care unit (ICU) patients and the impact of sedation on such discomfort. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of discomfort ev...

Chargement des enrichissements...