0 avis
A step too far or a step in the wrong direction? : a critique of the 2014 amendment to the Belgian euthanasia act
Article indépendant
In 2014, Article 3 of the the Belgian Euthanasia Act (2002) (the Euthanasia Act) was amended ('the Amendment') to include the 'capacity for discernment' requirement. This paper explores the implications of this highly controversial Amendment. I remain unconvinced of the benefits for children < 12 years old suffering chronic or terminal illnesses. In Part One, I argue that the phrase 'capacity for discernment' is problematic and vulnerable to abuse; neither a consistent, widely accepted definition of the phrase has been established nor a standardised method or procedure to adequately gauge a minor's capacity for discernment. In Part Two I advance the argument that specifically for children < 12 years, aggressive and sophisticated paediatric palliative care treatment, which risks, but does not intend death, is more ethically justified than Euthanasia treatment. A definition of a child's interests is best achieved through a care-based ethics framework; namely, the child's relationship with their parents and family members, their doctors and medical practitioners is held to be an interest of crucial importance for the child. I conclude that paediatric palliative care arguably better promotes and upholds this interest.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40592-021-00147-z
Voir la revue «Monash bioethics review»
Autres numéros de la revue «Monash bioethics review»
Consulter en ligne
Suggestions
Du même auteur
De la même série