0 avis
The intersection of neurology and religion : a survey of hospital chaplains on death by neurologic criteria
Article indépendant
BACKGROUND: To enhance knowledge about religious objections to brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC), we surveyed hospital chaplains about their experience with and beliefs about BD/DNC.
METHODS: We distributed an online survey to five chaplaincy organizations between February and July 2019.
RESULTS: There were 512 respondents from all regions of the USA; they were predominantly Christian (450 of 497; 91%), board certified (413 of 490; 84%), and employed by community hospitals (309 of 511; 61%). Half (274 of 508; 56%) of the respondents had been involved in a case in which a family objected to BD/DNC on the basis of their religious beliefs. In 20% of cases involving a religious objection, the patient was Buddhist, Hindu, Jewish, or Muslim. Most respondents believed that a person who is declared brain dead in accordance with the American Academy of Neurology standard is dead (427 of 510; 84%). A minority of respondents believed that a family should be able to choose whether an assessment for determination of BD/DNC is performed (81 of 512; 16%) or whether organ support is discontinued after BD/DNC (154 of 510; 30%). These beliefs were all significantly related to lack of awareness that BD/DNC is the medical and legal equivalent of cardiopulmonary death throughout the USA and that organ support is routinely discontinued after BD/DNC, outside of organ donation.
CONCLUSIONS: Hospital chaplains, who work at the intersection between religion and medicine, commonly encounter religious objections to BD/DNC. To prepare them for these situations, they should receive additional education about BD/DNC and management of religious objections to BD/DNC.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-021-01252-x
Voir la revue «Neurocritical care»
Autres numéros de la revue «Neurocritical care»
Consulter en ligne
Suggestions
Du même auteur
De la même série