End-of-life discussions in patients with heart failure

Article indépendant

YOUNG, Kathleen A. | REDFIELD, Margaret M. | STRAND, Jacob J. | DUNLAY, Shannon M.

BACKGROUND: Although guidelines call on clinicians to conduct regular conversations about advance care planning and end-of-life (EOL) preferences with patients with heart failure (HF), research suggests that physicians often avoid these discussions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between January 20, 2014 and January 18, 2016, Southeastern Minnesota residents hospitalized with acute decompensated HF (ADHF) at Mayo Clinic hospitals were enrolled into an observational cohort study that included the administration of face-to-face questionnaires. Risk of death (prognosis) was estimated using the Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure score. Among 400 patients (mean age 77.7 years, 46% female, 48% preserved ejection fraction), only 69 (17%) reported previously discussing EOL wishes with their physician. Patients reporting prior EOL discussions more often had an advance directive (81% vs. 66%, p=0.009), recognized the term 'hospice' (96% vs. 87%, p=0.027), and had more favorable attitudes of dying and hospice (p=0.030). Resuscitation preferences and rates of completion of advance directives varied with prognosis, though patient-clinician EOL discussions did not. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients hospitalized with ADHF did not recall discussing their preferences for EOL care with their physician. This represents an important modifiable gap in the optimal longitudinal care of HF patients.

https://www.onlinejcf.com/article/S1071-9164(17)31127-2/pdf

Voir la revue «Journal of cardiac failure, 23»

Autres numéros de la revue «Journal of cardiac failure»

• Description
• Sujet/Public
• Outil
• Outil d'anticipation
• Gestion