Conscience at the end of life

Article

BAERGEN, Ralph Neil | SKIDMORE, James

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Caring for patients at the end of life can involve issues that are ethically and legally fraught: withholding or withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration, pain control that could hasten death, aggressive treatment that is continued when it seems only to be prolonging suffering, patients who request medical assistance in dying, and so forth. Clinicians may find that their deeply held ethical principles conflict with law, institutional policy, or patients' choices. In these situations, they may consider either refusing to participate in procedures that they find morally abhorrent (conscientious refusal) or providing care that they believe to be ethically obligatory despite being contrary to law or policy (conscientious commitment). METHODS: This paper reviews the ethical issues involved. RESULTS: Each of the usual policies for handling conscientious refusals faces serious challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare providers who refuse to provide medical services should be expected to explain their reasons, make prompt referrals, and bear some of the resulting costs or burdens.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040298

Voir la revue «Nursing reports, 14»

Autres numéros de la revue «Nursing reports»

• Description
• Sujet/Public
• Outil
• Outil d'anticipation
• Gestion