0 avis
Validity and reliability of the integrated palliative care outcome scale for non-cancer patients
Article
Aim: This study assessed the validity and reliability of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale for non-cancer patients.
Methods: We recruited 223 non-cancer patients receiving palliative care and their healthcare providers (222) across two home care facilities and two hospitals for a cross-sectional study. We assessed the construct validity and known-group validity of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale. The weighted kappa and interclass correlation coefficients were assessed to ascertain reliability.
Results: The scale scores were significantly higher for the ‘non-stable’ group (worsening condition group) measured in the palliative care phase than for the ‘stable’ group (P < 0.001). Regarding validity, Spearman's correlations between similar items on the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale and Edmonton Symptom Assessment System ranged from 0.61 to 0.94. Regarding reliability, the weighted kappa coefficients ranged from 0.53 to 0.81 for patients and from 0.58 to 0.90 for healthcare providers. For inter-rater reliability between patients and healthcare providers, the weighted kappa coefficients for each item ranged from 0.03 to 0.42.
Conclusion: This study confirmed the validity and reliability of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale for non-cancer patients requiring palliative care. However, the inter-rater reliability indicates poor agreement between the assessments of patients and healthcare providers. This highlights the discrepancies between both their assessments and the importance of the patient's assessment.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14603
Voir la revue «Geriatrics and gerontology international, 23»
Autres numéros de la revue «Geriatrics and gerontology international»
Consulter en ligne
Suggestions
Du même auteur
De la même série