Observational study of survival outcomes of people referred for 'fast-track' end-of-life care funding in a district general hospital : too little too late?

Article indépendant

MORRISON, Jo | CHOUDHARY, Cherry | BEAZLEY, Ryan | RICHARDS, James | DAVIS, Charlie

BACKGROUND: End-of-life care requires support for people to die where they feel safe and well-cared for. End-of-life care may require funding to support dying outside of hospital. In England, funding is procured through Continuing Healthcare Fast-Track funding, requiring assessment to determine eligibility. Anecdotal evidence suggested that Fast-Track funding applications were deferred where clinicians thought this inappropriate due to limited life-expectancy. AIM: To evaluate overall survival after Fast-Track funding application. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation of Fast-Track funding application outcomes and survival. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: All people in 2021 who had a Fast-Track funding application from a medium-sized district general hospital in Southwest England. RESULTS: 439 people were referred for Fast-Track funding with a median age of 80 years (range 31-100 years). 413/439 (94.1%) died during follow-up, with a median survival of 15 days (range 0-436 days). Median survival for people with Fast-Track funding approved or deferred was 18 days and 25 days, respectively (p=0.0013). 129 people (29.4%) died before discharge (median survival 4 days) and only 7.5% were still alive 90 days after referral for Fast-Track funding. CONCLUSIONS: Fast-Track funding applications were deferred for those with very limited life-expectancy, with minimal clinical difference in survival (7 days) compared with those who had applications approved. This is likely to delay discharge to the preferred place of death and reduce quality of end-of-life care. A blanket acceptance of Fast-Track funding applications, with review for those still alive after 60 days, may improve end-of-life care and be more efficient for the healthcare system.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002279

Voir la revue «BMJ open quality, 12»

Autres numéros de la revue «BMJ open quality»

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Observational study of survival outcomes of p...

Article indépendant | MORRISON, Jo | BMJ open quality | n°2 | vol.12

BACKGROUND: End-of-life care requires support for people to die where they feel safe and well-cared for. End-of-life care may require funding to support dying outside of hospital. In England, funding is procured through Continuing...

Care first-fund later (CareFFuL) : an end-of-...

Article indépendant | MORRISON, Jo | BMJ open quality | n°2 | vol.13

Previous work found referrals for end-of-life care are made late in the dying process and assessment processes for care funding, through continuing healthcare fast-track funding often inhibit people being able to die at home. The ...

De la même série

Exploring the palliative care ecosystem in Th...

Article indépendant | PHENWAN, Tharin | BMJ open quality | n°1 | vol.13

INTRODUCTION: Palliative care is an approach that aims to holistically improve the quality of life, care and death of people living with life-limiting conditions as well as their families. In Thailand, palliative care became one o...

Proactive advance care planning conversations...

Article indépendant | WINNIFRITH, Tabitha | BMJ open quality | n°3 | vol.13

Advance care planning (ACP) is a process of discussion, reflection and communication, enabling planning for future medical treatment. Despite evidence of benefits of ACP to patients, families and the healthcare system, many die wi...

Driving communication forward : improving com...

Article indépendant | ISMAIL-CALLAGHAN, Seline | BMJ open quality | n°1 | vol.12

Introduction: The number of people requiring palliative care is increasing with an ageing comorbid population. Pain is a prevalent symptom for palliative care patients and is often managed with opioids. Opioids reduce reaction tim...

Learning needs and perceived barriers and fac...

Article indépendant | REID, Julie C. | BMJ open quality | n°2 | vol.12

Objectives: Caring for dying hospitalised patients is a healthcare priority. Our objective was to understand the learning needs of front-line nurses on the general internal medicine (GIM) hospital wards, and perceived barriers to,...

Observational study of survival outcomes of p...

Article indépendant | MORRISON, Jo | BMJ open quality | n°2 | vol.12

BACKGROUND: End-of-life care requires support for people to die where they feel safe and well-cared for. End-of-life care may require funding to support dying outside of hospital. In England, funding is procured through Continuing...

Chargement des enrichissements...