Use of palliative interventions at end of life for advanced gastrointestinal cancer

Article indépendant

CHEN, Vivi W. | PORTUONDO, Jorge I. | COOPER, Zara | MASSARWEH, Nader N.

BACKGROUND: Despite the well-established benefits of palliative care, little is known about the use of palliative interventions among patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer near the end of life (EOL). METHODS: A national cohort study analyzed 142,304 patients with advanced GI cancers (stage 3 or 4) near EOL (death within 1 year of diagnosis) in the National Cancer Database (2004-2014) who received palliative interventions (defined as treatment to relieve symptoms: surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and/or pain management). The study used multivariable hierarchical regression evaluate the association between the use of palliative interventions, temporal trends, and patient and hospital factors. RESULTS: Overall, 16.5% of the patients were treated with a palliative intervention, and use increased over time (13.4% in 2004 vs 19.8% in 2014; trend test, p < 0.001). Palliative interventions were used most frequently for esophageal cancer (20.6%) and least frequently for gallbladder cancer (13.3%). Palliative interventions were associated with younger age (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-0.99), recent diagnosis year (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.04-1.06), black race (white [ref]; OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12), insurance status (no insurance [ref]; private: OR, 0.92; 95% CI ,0.95-0.99), hospital type (community cancer program [ref]; integrated network cancer programs: OR, 1.37; 95% CI ,1.07-1.75), and stage 4 disease (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 2.07-2.27). Patients in southern and western regions were less likely to receive palliative intervention (Northeast [ref]; OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.94 and OR 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.57, respectively). CONCLUSION: Increased palliative intervention use over time suggests ongoing changes in how care is delivered to GI cancer patients toward EOL. However, sociodemographic and geographic variation suggests opportunities to address barriers to optimal EOL care.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12342-1

Voir la revue «Annals of surgical oncology»

Autres numéros de la revue «Annals of surgical oncology»

• Description
• Sujet/Public
• Outil
• Outil d'anticipation
• Gestion