Development and validation of clinical implementation methods for patient-reported outcomes in Japanese multi-center palliative care units

Article indépendant

ITO, Nao | SATO, Azusa | TAKEUCHI, Kana | SHIGENO, Tomoko | SASAKI, Hiroko | AOYAMA, Maho | MIYASHITA, Mitsunori

BACKGROUND: Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) are recommended for use in clinical oncology. However, they are not routinely used in professional palliative care practices in Japan. The reasons include both patient and healthcare provider factors and the implementation of PROs. This study aimed to develop and validate clinical implementation methods for PROs in Japanese palliative care units. METHODS: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was conducted with four palliative care units in Japan. The study was conducted in six steps: unit assessment, development and implementation of a PRO implementation plan, PRO post-implementation survey and analysis of its utilization, a review of the PRO implementation process, creation of a PRO implementation method in a palliative care unit, and use and verification of the implementation method. Steps 1-5 were the development phase, and step 6 was the verification phase. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with healthcare providers prior to PRO implementation. Intervention characteristics, patient needs in the palliative care unit, and factors related to the organization were identified as barriers. The implementation plan was developed, and the core members were selected. The implementation procedures were created in the above mentioned steps. PROs were used in the palliative care units. The same was true in the validation phase. CONCLUSIONS: This study guided PROs in specialized palliative care unit in a clinical setting. The method was developed and validated for the implementation of PROs in the palliative care unit. In the PRO implementation process, it was important to assess the unit, address the barriers to implementation, and reduce the burden on healthcare providers. Furthermore, healthcare providers had to be supported by the champion, a person responsible for the implementation of PROs in the palliative care unit.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00730-y

Voir la revue «Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 8»

Autres numéros de la revue «Journal of patient-reported outcomes»

• Description
• Sujet/Public
• Outil
• Outil d'anticipation
• Gestion