Farming intensity indirectly reduces crop yield through negative effects on agrobiodiversity and key ecological functions

Archive ouverte

Duflot, Rémi | San-Cristobal, Magali | Andrieu, Émilie | Choisis, Jean-Philippe | Esquerré, Diane | Ladet, Sylvie | Ouin, Annie | Rivers-Moore, Justine | Sheeren, David | Sirami, Clélia | Fauvel, Mathieu | Vialatte, A.

Edité par CCSD ; Elsevier -

International audience. Farming intensity and landscape heterogeneity influence agrobiodiversity and associated ecological functions. The relative contributions of these agroecosystem components to agricultural production remain unclear because of inter-relations and weather-dependant variations. Using a structural equation modelling approach, we estimated direct and indirect contributions of farming intensity (soil management, pesticide use and fertilisation) and landscape heterogeneity (of semi-natural covers and crop mosaic) to cereal crop production, in 54 fields (mostly wheat), in two years (24 and 30 fields). Indirect effects were evaluated through agrobiodiversity (carabid and plant communities) and ecological functions (pollination and pest control). In 2016, farming intensity had the largest direct positive effect on cereal crop yield, followed by agrobiodiversity (74% of the farming intensity impact) and ecological functions. However, the direct benefits of farming intensity were halved due to negative indirect effects, as farming intensity negatively affected within-field biodiversity and ecological functions. Overall, agrobiodiversity and farming intensity had equal net contributions to cereal crop yields, while heterogeneity of the crop mosaic enhanced biodiversity. In 2017, neither higher farming intensity nor agrobiodiversity and ecological functions could lift cereal production, which suffered from unfavourable meteorological conditions. Semi-natural habitats supported agrobiodiversity. Our study suggests that a reduction of farming intensity combined with higher heterogeneity of crop mosaic can enhance the benefits of ecological functions towards crop production. Semi-natural covers seem to play an essential role in the face of climatic events, by supporting agrobiodiversity and the potential resilience of the agroecosystem functioning.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

PSDR4 Sebioref - Une approche paysagère et territorialisée des services écosystémiques et des valeurs attachées pour guider les décideurs publics

Archive ouverte | Ouin, Annie | CCSD

Ce numéro regroupe des textes issus des projets ayant travaillé dans le cadre du Programme PSDR 4, sous l’égide d’INRAE et de 10 Régions françaises.2.1 Fonctionnalité des écosystèmes, le paysage et l’eau. International audience. ...

Une modelisation de la complexite des relations entre rendement agricole, services ecosystemiques et representations du paysage dans les coteaux de gascogne

Archive ouverte | San Cristobal, Magali | CCSD

Session Services écosystémiques. International audience. Quelle est l’influence relative du paysage et des pratiques agricoles sur le rendement des cultures ? Les effets du paysage sur le rendement s’expliquent-ils ...

Building a shared vision of the future for multifunctional agricultural landscapes. Lessons from a long term socio-ecological research site in south-western France

Archive ouverte | Ouin, Annie | CCSD

International audience. Societal demand for multifunctional agricultural landscapes keeps increasing. To promote such landscapes, it is necessary to identify which components of landscape heterogeneity support multi...

Chargement des enrichissements...