Randomized phase II–III study of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in previously untreated extensive small-cell lung cancer: results from the IFCT-0802 trial†

Archive ouverte

Pujol, J.-L. | Lavole, A. | Quoix, E. | Molinier, O. | Souquet, P.-J. | Barlesi, F. | Le Caer, H. | Moro-Sibilot, D. | Fournel, P. | Oster, J.-P. | Chatellain, P. | Barré, P. | Jeannin, G. | Mourlanette, P. | Derollez, M. | Herman, D. | Renault, A. | Dayen, C. | Lamy, P.-J. | Langlais, A. | Morin, F. | Zalcman, G. | (ifct), French Cooperative Thoracic Intergroup

Edité par CCSD ; Elsevier -

International audience. BACKGROUND:This randomized phase II-III trial sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab (Bev) following induction chemotherapy (CT) in extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).PATIENTS AND METHODS:Enrolled SCLC patients received two induction cycles of CT. Responders were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive four additional cycles of CT alone or CT plus Bev (7.5 mg/kg), followed by single-agent Bev until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was the percentage of patients for whom disease remained controlled (still in response) at the fourth cycle.RESULTS:In total, 147 patients were enrolled. Partial response was observed in 103 patients, 74 of whom were eligible for Bev and randomly assigned to the CT alone group (n = 37) or the CT plus Bev group (n = 37). Response assessment at the end of the fourth cycle showed that disease control did not differ between the two groups (89.2% versus 91.9% of patients remaining responders in CT alone versus CT plus Bev, respectively; Fisher's exact test: P = 1.00). Progression-free survival (PFS) since randomization did not significantly differ, with a median PFS of 5.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.9% to 6.0%] versus 5.3 months (95% CI 4.8% to 5.8%) in the CT alone and CT plus Bev groups, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) for CT alone: 1.1; 95% CI 0.7% to 1.7%; unadjusted P = 0.82]. Grade ≥2 hypertension and grade ≥3 thrombotic events were observed in 40% and 11% of patients, respectively, in the CT plus Bev group. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and soluble VEGF receptor titrations failed to identify predictive biomarkers.CONCLUSION:Administering 7.5 mg/kg Bev after induction did not improve outcome in extensive SCLC patients.TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00930891.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Consolidation nivolumab and ipilimumab versus observation in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer after chemo-radiotherapy – results from the randomised phase II ETOP/IFCT 4-12 STIMULI trial

Archive ouverte | Peters, S. | CCSD

International audience

Second-line therapy in elderly patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

Archive ouverte | Quoix, E. | CCSD

International audience. There is no dedicated study on second-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report the results on second-line erlotinib therapy from our prev...

IFCT-1502 CLINIVO: real-world evidence of long-term survival with nivolumab in a nationwide cohort of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Archive ouverte | Molinier, O. | CCSD

International audience. Background: Immunotherapy using inhibitors targeting immune checkpoint programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/ programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is currently the standard of care in patients ...

Chargement des enrichissements...