Impact on health-related quality of life of parenteral nutrition for patients with advanced cancer cachexia : results from a randomized controlled trial: parenteral nutrition for cancer-related cachexia

Article

BOULEUC, Carole | ANOTA, Amélie | CORNET, Cécile | GRODARD, Ghislain | THIERY-VUILLEMIN, Antoine | DUBROEUCQ, Olivier | CRETINEAU, Nathalie | FRASIE, Véronique | GAMBLIN, Vincent | CHVETZOFF, Gisèle | FAVIER, Laure | TOURNIGAND, Christophe | GRACH, Marie-Christine | RAYNARD, Bruno | SALAS, Sébastien | CAPODANO, Géraldine | PAZART, Lionel | AUBRY, Régis

Background: Malnutrition worsens health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the prognosis of patients with advanced cancer. This study aimed to assess the clinical benefits of parenteral nutrition (PN) over oral feeding (OF) for patients with advanced cancer cachexia and without intestinal impairment. Material and Methods: In this prospective multicentric randomized controlled study, patients with advanced cancer and malnutrition were randomly assigned to optimized nutritional care with or without supplemental PN. Zelen's method was used for randomization to facilitate inclusions. Nutritional and performance status and HRQoL using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire were evaluated at baseline and monthly until death. Primary endpoint was HRQoL deterioration-free survival (DFS) defined as a definitive deterioration of =10 points compared with baseline, or death. Results: Among the 148 randomized patients, 48 patients were in the experimental arm with PN, 63 patients were in the control arm with OF only, and 37 patients were not included because of early withdrawal or refused consent. In an intent to treat analysis, there was no difference in HRQoL DFS between the PN arm or OF arm for the three targeted dimensions: global health (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88–1.94; p = .18), physical functioning (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.06–2.35; p = .024), and fatigue (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.80–1.77; p = .40); there was a negative trend for overall survival among patients in the PN arm. In as treated analysis, serious adverse events (mainly infectious) were more frequent in the PN arm than in the OF arm (p = .01). Conclusion: PN improved neither HRQoL nor survival and induced more serious adverse events than OF among patients with advanced cancer and malnutrition. Clinical trial identification number. NCT02151214 Implications for Practice: This clinical trial showed that parenteral nutrition improved neither quality of life nor survival and generated more serious adverse events than oral feeding only among patients with advanced cancer cachexia and no intestinal impairment. Parenteral nutrition should not be prescribed for patients with advanced cancer, cachexia, and no intestinal failure when life expectancy is shorter than 3 months. Further studies are needed to assess the useful period with a potential benefit of artificial nutrition for patients with advanced cancer.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0856

Voir la revue «The oncologist, 25»

Autres numéros de la revue «The oncologist»

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Impact on health-related quality of life of p...

Article indépendant | BOULEUC, Carole | The oncologist | n°5 | vol.25

Background: Malnutrition worsens health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the prognosis of patients with advanced cancer. This study aimed to assess the clinical benefits of parenteral nutrition (PN) over oral feeding (OF) for p...

Impact on health-related quality of life of p...

Article indépendant | BOULEUC, Carole | The oncologist | n°5 | vol.25

Background: Malnutrition worsens health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the prognosis of patients with advanced cancer. This study aimed to assess the clinical benefits of parenteral nutrition (PN) over oral feeding (OF) for p...

Pallia-10, a screening tool to identify patie...

Article | MOLIN, Yann | Cancer medicine

PURPOSE: The identification and referral of patients in need of palliative care should be improved. The French society for palliative support and care recommended to use the PALLIA-10 questionnaire and its score greater than 3 to ...

De la même série

Perceptions of death among patients with adva...

Article | BIGI, Sarah | The oncologist | n°1 | vol.28

Background: Oncologists are often concerned that talking about death with patients may hinder their relationship. However, the views of death held by patients have not been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to describe the...

Impact on health-related quality of life of p...

Article | BOULEUC, Carole | The oncologist | n°5 | vol.25

Background: Malnutrition worsens health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the prognosis of patients with advanced cancer. This study aimed to assess the clinical benefits of parenteral nutrition (PN) over oral feeding (OF) for p...

Phase angle and the diagnosis of impending de...

Article | HUI, David | The oncologist

BACKGROUND: Phase angle is a prognostic factor in patients with months of survival, but its accuracy has not been examined in patients with weeks/days of survival. We determined the association between phase angle and survival in ...

Implementation of best practice recommendatio...

Article | GAHR, Susanne | The oncologist

BACKGROUND: From 2014 to 2017, the Palliative Medicine Working Group developed and published best practice recommendations for the integration of palliative care in Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCCs) in Germany. To evaluate the i...

Challenging the status quo of physician attir...

Article | AZHAR, Ahsan | The oncologist

BACKGROUND, AIM, AND HYPOTHESIS: This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the impact of a physician's attire on the perceptions of patients with cancer of compassion, professionalism, and physician preference. Our hypothe...

Chargement des enrichissements...