A descriptive analysis of obstacles to fulfilling the end of life care goals among cardiac arrest patients

Article indépendant

HADDAD, Ghania | LI, Timmy | TURRIN, Danielle | OWENS, Casey | ROLSTON, Daniel

Background and Objectives: Performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on cardiac arrest patients with Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders does not respect patients' autonomy. We aimed to 1) determine the frequency of patients who wished to be DNR prior to cardiac arrest; 2) determine what proportion received CPR; and 3) explain why DNR patients received CPR. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review study of cardiac arrest patients at an emergency department. We reported the frequency and proportion of patients who 1) had valid DNR orders presented at the time of cardiac arrest; 2) had valid DNR orders that were unavailable at the time of arrest 3) had Advanced Directives but no DNR orders; 4) had their DNR orders rescinded; and 5) wished to be DNR but did not have any documents in place. Results: Of 419 patients, 65 (15.51%) wished to be DNR. Out of these 65 patients, 38 (58.46 %) patients were resuscitated. Among the 38 patients, 23 (60.52%) received CPR accordingly and 15 (39.47%) patients were inappropriately resuscitated. Conclusion: In our sample of 419 patients, 65 (15.51%) did not want CPR in the event of cardiac arrest and 38 (9.06%) received CPR against their wishes. This was due to failure to document DNR orders, lack of recognition of documented valid DNR orders, and use of non-actionable Advanced Directives to relay patients' wishes.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100160

Voir la revue «Resuscitation plus, 8»

Autres numéros de la revue «Resuscitation plus»

• Description
• Sujet/Public
• Outil
• Outil d'anticipation
• Gestion