Organ donation after euthanasia starting at home in a patient with multiple system atrophy

Article indépendant

TAJAATE, Najat | VAN DIJK, Nathalie | PRAGT, Elien | SHAW, David | KEMPENER-DEGUELLE, A. | DE JONGH, Wim | BOLLEN, Jan | VAN MOOK, Walther

Background: A patient who fulfils the due diligence requirements for euthanasia, and is medically suitable, is able to donate his organs after euthanasia in Belgium, the Netherlands and Canada. Since 2012, more than 70 patients have undergone this combined procedure in the Netherlands. Even though all patients who undergo euthanasia are suffering hopelessly and unbearably, some of these patients are nevertheless willing to help others in need of an organ. Organ donation after euthanasia is a so-called donation after circulatory death (DCD), Maastricht category III procedure, which takes place following cardiac arrest, comparable to donation after withdrawal of life sustaining therapy in critically ill patients. To minimize the period of organ ischemia, the patient is transported to the operating room immediately after the legally mandated no-touch period of 5 min following circulatory arrest. This means that the organ donation procedure following euthanasia must take place in the hospital, which appears to be insurmountable to many patients who are willing to donate, since they already spent a lot of time in the hospital. Case presentation: This article describes the procedure of organ donation after euthanasia starting at home (ODAEH) following anesthesia in a former health care professional suffering from multiple system atrophy. This case is unique for at least two reasons. He spent his last conscious hours surrounded by his family at home, after which he underwent general anaesthesia and was intubated, before being transported to the hospital for euthanasia and organ donation. In addition, the patient explicitly requested the euthanasia to be performed in the preparation room, next to the operating room, in order to limit the period of organ ischemia due to transport time from the intensive care unit to the operating room. The medical, legal and ethical considerations related to this illustrative case are subsequently discussed. Conclusions: Organ donation after euthanasia is a pure act of altruism. This combined procedure can also be performed after the patient has been anesthetized at home and during transportation to the hospital.

https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-021-00686-4

Voir la revue «BMC medical ethics, 22»

Autres numéros de la revue «BMC medical ethics»

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Organ donation after euthanasia in patients s...

Article indépendant | VAN DIJK, Nathalie | Transplant international | vol.36

Euthanasia based on psychiatric suffering, followed by subsequent organ donation, is considered medically and legally permissible in the Netherlands. Although organ donation after euthanasia (ODE) in patients suffering from unbear...

Organ donation after euthanasia in patients s...

Article indépendant | VAN DIJK, Nathalie | Transplant international | vol.36

Euthanasia based on psychiatric suffering, followed by subsequent organ donation, is considered medically and legally permissible in the Netherlands. Although organ donation after euthanasia (ODE) in patients suffering from unbear...

Organ donation after euthanasia in a patient ...

Article indépendant | VAN DIJK, Nathalie | Frontiers in dementia | vol.2

BACKGROUND: Organ donation after euthanasia (ODE) has been performed over 100 times in the Netherlands, primarily involving patients suffering from a neurodegenerative or psychiatric disease. In recent years, the number of euthana...

De la même série

Students' attitudes toward euthanasia and abo...

Article indépendant | TUTIC GROKSA, Ivana | BMC medical ethics | n°1 | vol.26

INTRODUCTION: Abortion and euthanasia are still one of the greatest bioethical challenges. Previous studies have shown that there are differences in attitudes towards these issues depending on socio-demographic characteristics and...

Disparity in attitudes regarding assisted dyi...

Article indépendant | TAKIMOTO, Yoshiyuki | BMC medical ethics | n°1 | vol.26

BACKGROUND: Recently, an increasing number of countries have been allowing voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) as part of palliative care. Japan stands out as the most aged country in the develop...

Lay views in southern France of the acceptabi...

Article indépendant | MUNOZ SASTRE, María Teresa | BMC medical ethics | n°1 | vol.26

AIM: To carry out a detailed study of existing positions in the French public of the acceptability of refusing treatment because of alleged futility, and to try to link these to people's age, gender, and religious practice. METHOD...

Ethical issues raised in the care of the elde...

Article indépendant | BOUCHLAGHEM, Mohamed Amine | BMC medical ethics | n°1 | vol.26

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has led governments worldwide to make ethically controversial decisions. As a result, healthcare professionals are facing several ethical dilemmas, especially in terms of healthcare services provi...

Physicians' moral distinctions between medica...

Article indépendant | MATTHEW, Midori | BMC medical ethics | n°1 | vol.26

BACKGROUND: Medical assistance in dying (MAiD) was legalized in Canada following the Carter v. Canada ruling of 2015. In spite of legalization, the ethics of MAiD remain contentious. The bioethical literature has attempted to diff...

Chargement des enrichissements...