Perceptions of medical providers on morality and decision-making capacity in withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment and suicide

Article indépendant

HARTER, Thomas D. | STERENSON, Erin L. | BORGERT, Andrew | RASMUSSEN, Cary

Background: This study attempts to understand if medical providers beliefs about the moral permissibility of honoring patient-directed refusals of life-sustaining treatment (LST) are tied to their beliefs about the patient’s decision-making capacity. The study aims to answer: 1) does concern about a patient’s treatment decision-making capacity relate to beliefs about whether it is morally acceptable to honor a refusal of LST, 2) are there differences between provider types in assessments of decision-making capacity and the moral permissibility to refuse LST, and 3) do provider demographics impact beliefs about decision-making capacity and the moral permissibility to refuse LST. Methods: A mixed-methods survey using Likert assessment and vignette-based questions was administered to medical providers within a single health system in the upper Midwest (N = 714) to assess their perspectives on the moral acceptance and decision-making capacity in cases of withholding and withdrawing treatment and suicide. Results: Behavioral health providers report accepting of the moral permissibility of suicide (91.2%) more than either medical providers (77.2%) or surgeons (74.4%) (n = 283). Decision-making capacity was questioned more in the vignettes of the patients refusing life-saving surgery (36%) and voluntarily starvation (40.8%) than in the vignette of the patient requesting to deactivate a pacemaker (13%) (n = 283). Behavioral health providers were more concerned about the capacity to refuse life-saving surgery (55.9%) than medical providers (33.8%) or surgeons (23.1%) (n = 283). Conclusions: Respondents endorse the moral permissibility of persons to withhold or withdraw from treatment regardless of motive. Clinical concerns about a patient’s treatment decision-making capacity do not strongly correlate to views about the moral permissibility of honoring refusals of LST. Different provider types appear to have different thresholds for when to question treatment decision-making capacity. Behavioral health providers tend to question treatment decision-making capacity to refuse LST more than non-behavioral health providers.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2021.1887961

Voir la revue «AJOB empirical bioethics»

Autres numéros de la revue «AJOB empirical bioethics»

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Why Medicare should pay for advance care plan...

Article indépendant | HARTER, Thomas D. | PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE | n°3 | vol.23

L'auteur discute et argumente via les données de Medicare pourquoi le système de protection américain devrait prendre en charge la planification avancée des soins. Il montre que la planification avancée des soins est un bon moyen ...

De la même série

"God is the giver and taker of life". Muslim ...

Article indépendant | AHADDOUR, Chaïma | AJOB empirical bioethics

In the context of the Belgian debates on end-of-life care, the views of Muslims remain understudied. The aim of this article is twofold. First, we seek to document the relation between contemporary normative Muslim ideas on assist...

Clinicians' perspectives on the duty to infor...

Article indépendant | BRASSFIELD, Elizabeth R. | AJOB empirical bioethics

Background: As of 2019, ten jurisdictions in the United States have authorized physicians to prescribe a lethal dose of medication to a terminally ill patient for the purpose of hastening death. Relatively little bioethics scholar...

Perceptions of medical providers on morality ...

Article indépendant | HARTER, Thomas D. | AJOB empirical bioethics

Background: This study attempts to understand if medical providers beliefs about the moral permissibility of honoring patient-directed refusals of life-sustaining treatment (LST) are tied to their beliefs about the patient’s decis...

Nurses participation in limited resuscitation...

Article indépendant | STOKES, Felicia | AJOB empirical bioethics

Historically nurses have lacked significant input in end-of-life decision-making, despite being an integral part of care. Nurses experience negative feelings and moral conflict when forced to aggressively deliver care to patients ...

Ethical healthcare attitudes of Japanese citi...

Article indépendant | TAKIMOTO, Yoshiyuki | AJOB empirical bioethics

Background: In current Western medical ethics, patient-centered medicine is considered the norm. However, the cultural background of collectivism in East Asia often leads to family-centered decision-making. In Japan, prior studies...

Chargement des enrichissements...