Incorporating patient values in large language model recommendations for surrogate and proxy decisions

Article

NOLAN, Victoria J. | BALCH, Jeremy A. | BASKARAN, Naveen P. | SHICKEL, Benjamin | EFRON, Philip A. | UPCHURCH, Gilbert R. | BIHORAC, Azra | TIGNANELLI, Christopher J. | MOSELEY, Ray E. | LOFTUS, Tyler J.

BACKGROUND: Surrogates, proxies, and clinicians making shared treatment decisions for patients who have lost decision-making capacity often fail to honor patients' wishes, due to stress, time pressures, misunderstanding patient values, and projecting personal biases. Advance directives intend to align care with patient values but are limited by low completion rates and application to only a subset of medical decisions. Here, we investigate the potential of large language models (LLMs) to incorporate patient values in supporting critical care clinical decision-making for incapacitated patients in a proof-of-concept study. METHODS: We simulated text-based scenarios for 50 decisionally incapacitated patients for whom a medical condition required imminent clinical decisions regarding specific interventions. For each patient, we also simulated five unique value profiles captured using alternative formats: numeric ranking questionnaires, text-based questionnaires, and free-text narratives. We used pre-trained generative LLMs for two tasks: 1) text extraction of the treatments under consideration and 2) prompt-based question-answering to generate a recommendation in response to the scenario information, extracted treatment, and patient value profiles. Model outputs were compared with adjudications by three domain experts who independently evaluated each scenario and decision. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Automated extractions of the treatment in question were accurate for 88% (n = 44/50) of scenarios. LLM treatment recommendations received an average Likert score by the adjudicators of 3.92 of 5.00 (five being best) across all patients for being medically plausible and reasonable treatment recommendations, and 3.58 of 5.00 for reflecting the documented values of the patient. Scores were highest when patient values were captured as short, unstructured, and free-text narratives based on simulated patient profiles. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the potential for LLMs to function as support tools for surrogates, proxies, and clinicians aiming to honor the wishes and values of decisionally incapacitated patients.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001131

Voir la revue «Critical care explorations, 6»

Autres numéros de la revue «Critical care explorations»

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Incorporating patient values in large languag...

Article indépendant | NOLAN, Victoria J. | Critical care explorations | n°8 | vol.6

BACKGROUND: Surrogates, proxies, and clinicians making shared treatment decisions for patients who have lost decision-making capacity often fail to honor patients' wishes, due to stress, time pressures, misunderstanding patient va...

Honoring advance directives : a scoping revie...

Article | CHATHAM, Angus Hayes | JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE

Introduction: End-of-life clinical decision making can trigger profound emotional and financial distress. Advance directives intend to guide clinicians and surrogate decision makers; it is difficult to know how often they are hono...

Honoring advance directives : a scoping revie...

Article indépendant | CHATHAM, Angus Hayes | JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE

Introduction: End-of-life clinical decision making can trigger profound emotional and financial distress. Advance directives intend to guide clinicians and surrogate decision makers; it is difficult to know how often they are hono...

De la même série

Incorporating patient values in large languag...

Article | NOLAN, Victoria J. | Critical care explorations | n°8 | vol.6

BACKGROUND: Surrogates, proxies, and clinicians making shared treatment decisions for patients who have lost decision-making capacity often fail to honor patients' wishes, due to stress, time pressures, misunderstanding patient va...

Estimating the impact of words used by physic...

Article | DIDIODATO, Giulio | Critical care explorations | n°10 | vol.1

Objectives: To estimate the probability of a substitute decision maker choosing to withdraw life-sustaining therapy after hearing an affirmative patient response to the phrase "Do you want everything done?" Design: Discrete choice...

Chargement des enrichissements...