Self-administration or practitioner administration? : the scope of future German assisted dying legislation

Article

BRAUN, Kerstin

In 2020, the German Federal Constitutional Court declared unconstitutional and void a 2015 criminal law penalising suicide assistance in a recurring fashion and called into existence a right to a self-determined death, including the use of suicide services, where available. Due to subsequent legislative inaction, no holistic assisted dying legislation offering protection for vulnerable individuals is currently in place in Germany. Calls have been made for law reform in this area. This article contemplates the possible scope of a future assisted dying framework in Germany. It does so by focusing on the method of administration and analyses whether such a framework should be limited to allowing eligible persons to self-administer relevant lethal medications, which have been prescribed to them by a medical practitioner or whether, and to what extent, practitioners should be able to administer relevant lethal substances to patients. This is comparatively analysed while also keeping in mind any stipulations made by the German Constitutional Court in its 2020 judgment on the requirements of future assisted dying legislation. The article concludes that an assisted dying framework allowing a free choice between self and practitioner administration in Germany best complies with the guidance provided by the Constitutional Court.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwac034

Voir la revue «Medical law review»

Autres numéros de la revue «Medical law review»

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Self-administration or practitioner administr...

Article indépendant | BRAUN, Kerstin | Medical law review

In 2020, the German Federal Constitutional Court declared unconstitutional and void a 2015 criminal law penalising suicide assistance in a recurring fashion and called into existence a right to a self-determined death, including t...

Self-administration or practitioner administr...

Article indépendant | BRAUN, Kerstin | Medical law review

In 2020, the German Federal Constitutional Court declared unconstitutional and void a 2015 criminal law penalising suicide assistance in a recurring fashion and called into existence a right to a self-determined death, including t...

Looking back to look forward - the history of...

Article | BRAUN, Kerstin | Medical law review

Taking one's own life or attempting to do so has long been decriminalised in Australia. Aiding, counselling, or inciting another person to kill him or herself, however, remains a criminal offence. Yet, all six Australian States ha...

De la même série

How does regulation influence euthanasia prac...

Article | ARCHER, Madeleine | Medical law review | n°1 | vol.33

Euthanasia has been legal in Belgium since 2002. Despite extensive research exploring Belgian euthanasia practice, investigations into its governing regulatory framework are limited. Existing studies that consider regulation take ...

How best to regulate voluntary assisted dying...

Article | WHITE, Ben P. | Medical law review | n°1 | vol.33

It is widely accepted that voluntary assisted dying (VAD) should be regulated but little is known about the most effective way to regulate doctors in this setting. This article reports on empirical research conducted in two Austra...

Assisted dying, vulnerability, and the potent...

Article | MULLOCK, Alexandra | Medical law review | n°2 | vol.33

Concern for vulnerable people is a crucial issue when considering the legalization of assisted dying (AD), but the meaning and normative significance of vulnerability in this context is under-explored. We examine vulnerability and...

Mortier v belgium [2022] echr 764 : warning s...

Article | BURT, Chay M. | Medical law review | n°4 | vol.31

The case of Mortier v Belgium,1 heard in the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), considered the compatibility of a permissive framework for assisted dying against rights enshrined within the European Convention on Human Rights...

DNACPR decisions : aligning law, guidance, an...

Article | MICHALOWSKI, Sabine | Medical law review | n°3 | vol.30

Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions are a means to consider in advance the appropriateness of CPR measures if an acute crisis arises. During the COVID-19 pandemic, problems with such decisions, for exam...

Chargement des enrichissements...