Assessment of readability, reliability, and quality of chatgpt®, bard®, gemini®, copilot®, perplexity® responses on palliative care

Article indépendant

HANCI, Volkan | ERGUN, Bisar | GUL, Sanser | UZUN, Ozcan | ERDEMIR, Ismail | HANCI, Ferid Baran

There is no study that comprehensively evaluates data on the readability and quality of “palliative care” information provided by artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots ChatGPT®, Bard®, Gemini®, Copilot®, Perplexity®. Our study is an observational and cross-sectional original research study. In our study, AI chatbots ChatGPT®, Bard®, Gemini®, Copilot®, and Perplexity® were asked to present the answers of the 100 questions most frequently asked by patients about palliative care. Responses from each 5 AI chatbots were analyzed separately. This study did not involve any human participants. Study results revealed significant differences between the readability assessments of responses from all 5 AI chatbots (P < .05). According to the results of our study, when different readability indexes were evaluated holistically, the readability of AI chatbot responses was evaluated as Bard®, Copilot®, Perplexity®, ChatGPT®, Gemini®, from easy to difficult (P < .05). In our study, the median readability indexes of each of the 5 AI chatbots Bard®, Copilot®, Perplexity®, ChatGPT®, Gemini® responses were compared to the “recommended” 6th grade reading level. According to the results of our study answers of all 5 AI chatbots were compared with the 6th grade reading level, statistically significant differences were observed in the all formulas (P < .001). The answers of all 5 artificial intelligence robots were determined to be at an educational level well above the 6th grade level. The modified DISCERN and Journal of American Medical Association scores was found to be the highest in Perplexity® (P < .001). Gemini® responses were found to have the highest Global Quality Scale score (P < .001). It is emphasized that patient education materials should have a readability level of 6th grade level. Of the 5 AI chatbots whose answers about palliative care were evaluated, Bard®, Copilot®, Perplexity®, ChatGPT®, Gemini®, their current answers were found to be well above the recommended levels in terms of readability of text content. Text content quality assessment scores are also low. Both the quality and readability of texts should be brought to appropriate recommended limits.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000039305

Voir la revue «Medicine, 103»

Autres numéros de la revue «Medicine»

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Assessment of readability, reliability, and q...

Article indépendant | HANCI, Volkan | Medicine | n°33 | vol.103

There is no study that comprehensively evaluates data on the readability and quality of “palliative care” information provided by artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots ChatGPT®, Bard®, Gemini®, Copilot®, Perplexity®. O...

Gender distribution of editorial board member...

Article | OLBECI, Ozcan | JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE

Objective: Although the representation of women in palliative care has improved in recent years, gender inequality still exists in editorial leadership. This study aimed to characterize gender distribution in leadership positions ...

Gender distribution of editorial board member...

Article indépendant | OLBECI, Ozcan | JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE

Objective: Although the representation of women in palliative care has improved in recent years, gender inequality still exists in editorial leadership. This study aimed to characterize gender distribution in leadership positions ...

De la même série

Nutritional therapy in palliative care units ...

Article indépendant | ONER, Özlem | Medicine | n°10 | vol.104

This bibliometric review aimed to provide a general picture and systematic mapping of research trends in palliative care (PC) and nutrition internationally. The Web of Science (WoS) database was searched on May 7, 2024, for origin...

Assessment of readability, reliability, and q...

Article indépendant | HANCI, Volkan | Medicine | n°33 | vol.103

There is no study that comprehensively evaluates data on the readability and quality of “palliative care” information provided by artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots ChatGPT®, Bard®, Gemini®, Copilot®, Perplexity®. Our study is ...

Acceptance status and influencing factors of ...

Article indépendant | ZHENG, Xiu | Medicine | n°49 | vol.103

The aging population has become a severe public health issue both in China and globally. Over 180 million elderly people in China have chronic diseases, with 75% of them suffering from 2 or more chronic diseases, posing significan...

Opioids and constipation therapy in the last ...

Article indépendant | RIBEIRO, Hugo | Medicine | n°3 | vol.102

The use of opioids to control pain at the end of life may cause constipation, a symptom that can negatively influence the well-being of patients and caregivers. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of constipation...

Which factors are helpful for the early deter...

Article indépendant | KIM, Sun-Hyung | Medicine | n°37 | vol.101

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is widely known to be associated with high mortality and poor prognosis, especially in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The objective of this study was to investigate clinical pre...

Chargement des enrichissements...