A direct observation of pain scale use in five video-recorded palliative care consultations : using conversation analysis to show how practitioners support patients to describe pain

Article

JENKINS, Laura | PARRY, Ruth | FAULL, Christina

Objective: Assessing pain intensity is an important palliative care task. Self-report pain intensity scales are frequently used within assessment. In contrast to formal studies of validity and reliability, we examine administration of, and responses to these scales in everyday palliative care. Methods: We searched episodes of pain scale use in a dataset of (video/audio-recorded) UK palliative care consultations involving five doctors, 37 terminally ill patients and their companions. We found five, and applied the techniques and tools of conversation analysis to characterise scales’ administration and functioning. Results: Generally, the patients responded to scales by reporting multiple aspects of pain; the doctors supported and encouraged this. In two episodes, the scales generated misunderstandings. The doctors worked to resolve these in ways that avoided implying the patient was at fault. Conclusion: Pain intensity scales can yield richer information than just intensity. They can also generate misunderstandings and social friction which take skill and effort to resolve. Practice implications: Patients tend to respond to pain intensity scales by reporting on multiple aspects of pain, professionals should support them in this. These scales sometimes generate misunderstandings. To preserve the therapeutic relationship, professionals should work to resolve these without implying the patient is to blame.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399121006868

Voir la revue «Patient education and counseling»

Autres numéros de la revue «Patient education and counseling»

• Description
• Sujet/Public
• Outil
• Outil d'anticipation
• Gestion