Optimal mode for delivery of seasonal malaria chemoprevention in Ouelessebougou, Mali: A cluster randomized trial

Archive ouverte

Barry, Amadou | Issiaka, Djibrilla | Traore, Tiangoua | Mahamar, Almahamoudou | Diarra, Boubacar | Sagara, Issaka | Kone, Diakalia, T | Doumbo, Ogobara, K | Duffy, Patrick | Fried, Michal | Dicko, Alassane

Edité par CCSD ; Public Library of Science -

International audience. BACKGROUND:Seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC), the administration of complete therapeutic courses of antimalarials to children aged 3-59 months during the malaria transmission season, is a new strategy recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for malaria control in Sahelian countries such as Mali with seasonal transmission. The strategy is a highly cost-effective approach to reduce malaria burden in these areas. Despite the substantial benefits of SMC on malaria infection and disease, the optimal approach to deliver SMC remains to be determined. While fixed-point delivery (FPD) and non-directly observed treatment (NDOT) by community health workers are logistically attractive, these need to be evaluated and compared to other modes of delivery for maximal coverage.METHODS:To determine the optimal mode fixed-point (FPD) vs door-to-door delivery (DDD); directly observed treatment (DOT) vs. non- directly observed treatment (NDOT)), 31 villages in four health sub-districts were randomized to receive three rounds of SMC with Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus Amodiaquine (SP+AQ) at monthly intervals using one of the following methods: FPD+DOT; FPD+NDOT; DDD+DOT; DDD+NDOT. The primary endpoint was SMC coverage assessed by cross-sectional survey of 2,035 children at the end of intervention period.RESULTS:Coverage defined as the proportion of children who received all three days of SMC treatment during the three monthly rounds based information collected by interview (primary endpoint) was significantly higher in children who received SMC using DDD 74% (95% CI 69% - 80%) compared to FPD 60% (95% CI 50% - 70%); p = 0.009. It was similar in children who received SMC using DOT or NDOT 65%, (95% CI 55% - 76%) versus 68% (95% CI 57% - 79%); p = 0.72.CONCLUSIONS:In summary, door-to-door delivery of SMC provides better coverage than FPD. Directly observed therapy, which requires more time and resources, did not improve coverage with SMC.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Measuring the impact of seasonal malaria chemoprevention as part of routine malaria control in Kita, Mali

Archive ouverte | Diawara, Fatou | CCSD

International audience. Background: Seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) is a new strategy recommended by WHO in areas of highly seasonal transmission in March 2012. Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) ha...

Seasonal Malaria Vaccination with or without Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention

Archive ouverte | Chandramohan, Daniel | CCSD

International audience. Background: Malaria control remains a challenge in many parts of the Sahel and sub-Sahel regions of Africa.Methods: We conducted an individually randomized, controlled trial to assess whether...

“Spatial heterogeneity of environmental risk in randomized prevention trials: consequences and modeling”

Archive ouverte | Guindo, Abdoulaye | CCSD

International audience. BACKGROUND:In the context of environmentally influenced communicable diseases, proximity to environmental sources results in spatial heterogeneity of risk, which is sometimes difficult to mea...

Chargement des enrichissements...