Development of adverse outcome pathways relevant for the identification of substances having endocrine disruption properties Uterine adenocarcinoma as adverse outcome

Archive ouverte

Hernandez-Jerez, Antonio | Adriaanse, Paulien | Aldrich, Annette | Berny, Philippe | Coja, Tamara | Duquesne, Sabine | Focks, Andreas | Millet, Maurice | Pelkonen, Olavi | Pieper, Silvia | Tiktak, Aaldrik | Topping, Christopher | Widenfalk, Anneli | Wilks, Martin | Wolterink, Gerrit | Angeli, Karine | Recordati, Camilla | van Duursen, Majorie | Aiassa, Elisa | Lanzoni, Anna | Lostia, Alfonso | Martino, Laura | Guajardo, Irene Pilar Munoz | Panzarea, Martina | Terron, Andrea | Marinovich, Marina

Edité par CCSD ; European Food Safety Authority -

International audience. Development of adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) for uterine adenocarcinoma can provide a practical tool to implement the EFSA-ECHA Guidance (2018) for the identification of endocrine disruptors in the context of Regulations (EU) No 528/2012 and (EC) No 1107/2009. AOPs can give indications about the strength of the relationship between an adverse outcome (intended as a human health outcome) and chemicals (pesticides but not only) affecting the pathways. In this scientific opinion, the PPR Panel explored the development of AOPs for uterine adenocarcinoma. An evidence-based approach methodology was applied, and literature reviews were produced using a structured framework assuring transparency, objectivity, and comprehensiveness. Several AOPs were developed; these converged to a common critical node, that is increased estradiol availability in the uterus followed by estrogen receptor activation in the endometrium; therefore, a putative AOP network was considered. An uncertainty analysis and a probabilistic quantification of the weight of evidence have been carried out via expert knowledge elicitation for each set of MIEs/KEs/KERs included in individual AOPs. The collected data on the AOP network were evaluated qualitatively, whereas a quantitative uncertainty analysis for weight of the AOP network certainty has not been performed. Recommendations are provided, including exploring further the uncertainties identified in the AOPs and putative AOP network; further methodological developments for quantifying the certainty of the KERs and of the overall AOPs and AOP network; and investigating of NAMs applications in the context of some of the MIEs/KEs currently part of the putative AOP network developed.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Statement on the active substance flupyradifurone

Archive ouverte | Hernandez Jerez, Antonio | CCSD

3/2. International audience. Flupyradifurone is a novel butenolide insecticide, first approved as an active substance for use in plant protection products by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2084. Follow...

Statement on the active substance acetamiprid

Archive ouverte | Hernandez Jerez, Antonio | CCSD

3/2. International audience. Acetamiprid is a pesticide active substance with insecticidal action currently under the third renewal (AIR3) of the Commission implementing regulation (EU) No 844/2012. Following concer...

Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) on testing and interpretation of comparative in vitro metabolism studies

Archive ouverte | Hernandez‐jerez, Antonio, F | CCSD

International audience. EFSA asked the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their residues to deliver a Scientific Opinion on testing and interpretation of comparative in vitro metabolism studies for both new acti...

Chargement des enrichissements...