Third Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Placement Following Two Failures in Males: A Real‐World Multicenter Study

Archive ouverte

Meyer, Francois | Cotte, Juliette | Bento, Lucas | Nicaud, Guillaume | Werth, Hubert | Dubois, Alexandre | Saussine, Christian | Desgranchamps, François | Chartier-Kastler, Emmanuel | Gamé, Xavier | Hermieu, Jean‐françois | Cornu, Jean‐nicolas | Peyronnet, Benoît

Edité par CCSD ; Wiley -

International audience. ABSTRACT Introduction The reoperation rate for artificial urinary sphincters (AUS) in men is about 25%, with poorer survival rates when reimplantation occurs after urethral erosion or infection. Data on the outcomes of second AUS implants are rare, and no data exist for third AUS implants. We aimed to evaluate the functional and survival outcomes of a third AUS after two previous explantations. Methods The records of all patients implanted with a third AUS between 2006 and 2023 in seven French university hospitals were reviewed retrospectively. Only AUS implants following two previous AUS cuff explantations or revisions were included. The primary endpoint was the reoperation‐free survival of the third AUS. Secondary endpoints included functional outcomes at 6 months and at the last follow‐up, and overall functional outcomes after possible subsequent AUS implants, as well as reoperations. Results A total of 75 patients were included. Early complications occurred in 16.7% of patients. Median follow‐up was 11 months (1–122), 28 explantations were required (37.3%). The 5‐year reoperation‐free survival rate was 34.8%. The only significant predictive factor for explantation was smoking. At 6 months, 66.2% of patients were socially continent (0–1 protection per day), 10.8% were improved, and 23% were unchanged or worsened. At the last follow‐up of the third AUS, these results were 40%, 5.3%, and 54.7%, respectively. However, at the last overall follow‐up (median 12 months, 1–183), social continence was 54.8%, improvement 9.6%, and failure 35.6%, with 23 patients (30.7%) receiving a fourth or fifth AUS. Conclusion Early functional outcomes of a third AUS are similar to primary AUS, but survival rates and late functional outcomes are inferior. Predictive factors for outcomes were related to patients, not the surgery itself. A third AUS may be suitable for motivated patients with limited therapeutic options. Further studies are needed to refine patient selection and assess the impact of reimplantation techniques on outcomes.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Current state of knowledge of urology residents and fellows on the neuro-urological management of spina bifida patients in France. État des lieux des connaissances des internes et chefs de clinique d’urologie sur la prise en charge neuro-urologique des patients spina bifida en France

Archive ouverte | Lévy, Stéphan | CCSD

National audience. OBJECTIVE: To assess the current knowledge of French urology residents and fellows about neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction and their management in patients with spina bifida. MATERIAL AND...

Which revision strategy is the best for non-mechanical failure of male artificial urinary sphincter?

Archive ouverte | Cousin, Tiffany | CCSD

International audience

Efficacy and safety of intradetrusor botulinum toxin injections for idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome in patients with an artificial urinary sphincter

Archive ouverte | de Sallmard, Geoffroy | CCSD

International audience

Chargement des enrichissements...