Overall Survival From the EORTC LCG-1613 APPLE Trial of Osimertinib Versus Gefitinib Followed by Osimertinib in Advanced EGFR -Mutant Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Archive ouverte

Remon, Jordi | Besse, Benjamin | Aix, Santiago Ponce | Callejo, Ana | Al-Rabi, Kamal | Bernabe, Reyes | Greillier, Laurent | Majem, Margarita | Reguart, Noemi | Monnet, Isabelle | Cousin, Sophie | Garrido, Pilar | Robinet, Gilles | Campelo, Rosario Garcia | Madroszyk, Anne | Mazières, Julien | Curcio, Hubert | Wasąg, Bartosz | Pretzenbacher, Yassin | Grillet, Fanny | Dingemans, Anne-Marie | Dziadziuszko, Rafal

Edité par CCSD ; American Society of Clinical Oncology -

International audience. Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. Osimertinib has been established as a standard of care for patients with common sensitizing EGFR-mutant advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) although the sequential approach (first-generation inhibitor gefitinib followed by osimertinib) has not been formally compared. The phase II APPLE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02856893 ) enrolled 156 treatment-naïve patients, and two treatment strategies were evaluated: osimertinib up front or the sequential treatment approach with gefitinib up front followed by osimertinib at the time of progression, either molecular progression (detection of plasma T790M resistance mutation) regardless of the radiologic status or just at the time of radiologic progression. Patients' characteristics were well balanced, except for the higher proportion of baseline brain metastases in the sequential approach (29% v 19%). Per protocol, 73% of patients switched to osimertinib in the sequential arm. Up-front treatment with osimertinib was associated with a lower risk of brain progression versus the sequential approach (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54 [90% CI, 0.34 to 0.86]), but a comparable overall survival was observed between both strategies (HR, 1.01 [90% CI, 0.61 to 1.68]), with the 18-month survival probability of 84% and 82.3%, respectively. The APPLE trial suggests that a sequential treatment approach is associated with more frequent progression in the brain but a similar survival in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Exercise in lung Cancer, the healthcare providers opinion (E.C.H.O.): Results of the EORTC lung cancer Group (LCG) survey

Archive ouverte | Pilotto, Sara | CCSD

International audience. Exercise has been reported to alleviate disease as well as treatment impact in patients with lung cancer. Nevertheless, there is limited information available regarding the perception of lung...

Definition of Synchronous Oligometastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer—A Consensus Report

Archive ouverte | Dingemans, Anne-Marie | CCSD

International audience

Phase III randomized study of carboplatin pemetrexed with or without bevacizumab with initial versus “at progression” cerebral radiotherapy in advanced non squamous non-small cell lung cancer with asymptomatic brain metastasis

Archive ouverte | Monnet, Isabelle | CCSD

International audience. Background: The role and timing of whole or stereotaxic brain radiotherapy (BR) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) and asymptomatic brain metastases (aBMs) are not ...

Chargement des enrichissements...