0 avis
Systematic Review of Femoral Artery Stent Fractures
Archive ouverte
International audience. Objective Primary stenting for long femoropopliteal (FP) lesions remains controversial because of the high risk of stent fracture (SF). This study aimed to summarise current knowledge on SF from randomised control trials about FP stenting. Methods A systematic review of the Medline database was performed by a combined strategy of MeSH terms: femoral artery, popliteal artery, stenting, and stent fracture. SF was classified according to a standard classification: 1 = single strut fracture; 2 = ≥ two struts fracture; 3 = type 2 with deformation; 4 = multiple struts fracture with acquired transection; 5, type 4 with gap in the stent body. Results The literature search identified 25 publications including covered stents (CSs; n = 3), drug eluting stents (DESs; n = 8), bare metal stents (BMS; n = 17), and bioabsorbable stents (n = 1). Data were extracted from 4 047 patients; mean age ± standard deviation was 68.9 ± 3.0 years and 69% were male. The median lesion length was 87.6 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 70.0, 149) with a median chronic total occlusion proportion of 36.8% (IQR 29.0, 56.5). In 208 patients treated with CS, SF rates ranged from none to 2.6% at 36 months with no clinical correlation. In 1 106 patients treated with DES, SF rates were relatively low in large cohorts, ranging from 0% at 12 months to 1.9% at 60 months. In smaller cohorts (under 100 patients per group), they ranged from 12.5% at six months to 46.7% at 12 months, with no clinical repercussion. In 1 610 patients treated with BMS, SF rates ranged from 2% to 32.7% at 12 months and from 2.9% to 48.9% at 24 months, with no clinical repercussion. Conclusion SF rates in large cohorts were low in CF and DES, and quite common in BMS, although none of them had clinical consequences. However, longer follow up and detailed, accurate reports are needed to assess eventual real clinical outcomes.
Consulter en ligne
Suggestions
Du même auteur
