Mismatched related donor allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation compared to other donor types for Ph+ chronic myeloid leukaemia: A retrospective analysis from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT.

Archive ouverte

Onida, Francesco | Gras, Luuk | Ge, Junran | Koster, Linda | Hamladji, Rose-Marie | Byrne, Jenny | Avenoso, Daniele | Aljurf, Mahmoud | Robin, Marie | Halaburda, Kazimierz | Passweg, Jakob | Salmenniemi, Urpu | Sengeloev, Henrik | Apperley, Jane | Clark, Andrew | Reményi, Péter | Morozova, Elena | Kinsella, Francesca | Lenhoff, Stig | Ganser, Arnold | Wu, Ka Lung | Perez-Martinez, Antonio | Hayden, Patrick J. | Raj, Kavita | Drozd-Sokolowska, Joanna | Ortí, Guillermo | de Lavallade, Hugues | Yakoub-Agha, Ibrahim | Mclornan, Donal P. | Chalandon, Yves

Edité par CCSD ; Wiley -

International audience. Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains an option for tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) in first chronic phase (CP1) and high-risk patients with advanced disease phases. In this European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry-based study of 1686 CML patients undergoing first allo-HCT between 2012 and 2019, outcomes were evaluated according to donor type, particularly focusing on mismatched related donors (MMRDs). Median age at allo-HCT was 46 years (IQR 36–55). Disease status was CP1 in 43%, second CP (CP2) or later in 27%, accelerated phase in 12% and blast crisis in 18%. Donor type was matched related (MRD) in 39.2%, MMRD in 8.1%, matched unrelated (MUD) in 40.2%, and mismatched unrelated (MMUD) in 12.6%. In 4 years, overall survival (OS) for MRD, MMRD, MUD and MMUD was 61%, 56%, 63% and 59% (p = 0.21); relapse-free survival (RFS) was 48%, 42%, 52% and 46% (p = 0.03); cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 33%, 37%, 27% and 30% (p = 0.07); non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 19%, 21%, 21% and 24% (p = 0.21); and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD)-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 16%, 18%, 22% and 15% (p = 0.05) respectively. On multivariate analysis, MMRD use associated with longer engraftment times and higher risk of graft failure compared to MRD or MUD. There was no statistical evidence that MMRD use associated with different OS, RFS and incidence of GvHD compared to other donor types.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis with Post Transplant Cyclophosphamide in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia patients undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant from either an Unrelated or Mismatched Related Donor: a comparative study from the Chr...

Archive ouverte | Ortí, Guillermo | CCSD

International audience. Outcomes following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) using an unrelated donor (UD) ...

Are syngeneic donors a viable donor option in allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for MDS? A brief report on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT and review of current literature.

Archive ouverte | Robin, Marie | CCSD

International audience

Does IPSS-R down staging before transplantation improve the prognosis of patients with Myelodysplastic neoplasms?

Archive ouverte | Scheid, Christof | CCSD

International audience. In patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), higher revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) scores at transplant are associated with worse transplant outcome and, thus, l...

Chargement des enrichissements...