Performance of viruses and bacteriophages for fecal source determination in a multi-laboratory, comparative study

Archive ouverte

Harwood, Valerie J. | Boehm, Alexandria B. | Sassoubre, Lauren M. | Vijayavel, Kannappan | Stewart, Jill R. | Fong, Theng-Theng | Caprais, Marie-Paule | Converse, Reagan R. | Diston, David | Ebdon, James | Fuhrman, Jed A. | Gourmelon, Michele | Gentry-Shields, Jennifer | Griffith, John F. | Kashian, Donna R. | Noble, Rachel T. | Taylor, Huw | Wicki, Melanie

Edité par CCSD ; IWA Publishing/Elsevier -

An inter-laboratory study of the accuracy of microbial source tracking (MST) methods was conducted using challenge fecal and sewage samples that were spiked into artificial freshwater and provided as unknowns (blind test samples) to the laboratories. The results of the Source Identification Protocol Project (SIPP) are presented in a series of papers that cover 41 MST methods. This contribution details the results of the virus and bacteriophage methods targeting human fecal or sewage contamination. Human viruses used as source identifiers included adenoviruses (HAdV), enteroviruses (EV), norovirus Groups I and II (NoVI and NoVII), and polyomaviruses (HPyVs). Bacteriophages were also employed, including somatic coliphages and F-specific RNA bacteriophages (FRNAPH) as general indicators of fecal contamination. Bacteriophage methods targeting human fecal sources included genotyping of FRNAPH isolates and plaque formation on bacterial hosts Enterococcus faecium MB-55, Bacteroides HB-73 and Bacteroides GB-124. The use of small sample volumes (<= 50 ml) resulted in relatively insensitive theoretical limits of detection (10-50 gene copies or plaques x 50 ml(-1)) which, coupled with low virus concentrations in samples, resulted in high false-negative rates, low sensitivity, and low negative predictive values. On the other hand, the specificity of the human virus methods was generally close to 100% and positive predictive values were similar to 40-70% with the exception of NoVs, which were not detected. The bacteriophage methods were generally much less specific toward human sewage than virus methods, although FRNAPH II genotyping was relatively successful, with 18% sensitivity and 85% specificity. While the specificity of the human virus methods engenders great confidence in a positive result, better concentration methods and larger sample volumes must be utilized for greater accuracy of negative results, i.e. the prediction that a human contamination source is absent.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Performance of human fecal anaerobe-associated PCR-based assays in a multi-laboratory method evaluation study

Archive ouverte | Layton, Blythe A. | CCSD

A number of PCR-based methods for detecting human fecal material in environmental waters have been developed over the past decade, but these methods have rarely received independent comparative testing in large multi-laboratory st...

Evaluation of the repeatability and reproducibility of a suite of qPCR-based microbial source tracking methods

Archive ouverte | Ebentier, Darcy L. | CCSD

Many PCR-based methods for microbial source tracking (MST) have been developed and validated within individual research laboratories. Inter-laboratory validation of these methods, however, has been minimal, and the effects of prot...

Comparison of PCR and quantitative real-time PCR methods for the characterization of ruminant and cattle fecal pollution sources

Archive ouverte | Raith, Meredith R. | CCSD

The State of California has mandated the preparation of a guidance document on the application of fecal source identification methods for recreational water quality management. California contains the fifth highest population of c...

Chargement des enrichissements...