Nicorandil and cutaneous ulcerations, their misdiagnosis and consequences: illustration by five cases reports and a review of the french pharmacovigilance database

Archive ouverte

Bene, Johana | Carpentier, Olivier | Sabanowski, Sonia | Laroche, Marie-Laure | Beyens, Marie-Noelle | Lambert, Marc | Gautier, Sophie

Edité par CCSD ; EDP Sciences - Depuis 2016, la revue Thérapie n’est plus publiée par EDP Sciences.> Therapies (Elsevier) -

International audience. While physicians increasingly recognize nicorandil-related mucocutaneous ulcerations, there are still misdiagnoses, particularly in the case of unusual location and late onset ulceration after nicorandil introduction. The goal of our study was to remind clinicians about the link between nicorandil use and the development of cutaneous ulcerations and to highlight the risk of misdiagnosis. We describe five reports diagnosed by the same dermatologist, complemented by an analysis of the French pharmacovigilance database (FPVD) from 1 January 1994 to 5 January 2017. During this period, 28 reports of strict cutaneous ulcerations due to nicorandil, in addition to our five reports, were registered in the FPVD. For those 28 reports, the time to onset between nicorandil introduction and cutaneous ulcerations was quite long and exceeded one year in 16 reports (information specified in 25 reports). The delay between ulcerations observation and nicorandil discontinuation was variable, with immediate diagnosis in seven reports, but ranged from fifteen days to twelve years in 21 reports. The main locations were lower limbs, thorax and face. Ulcerations could be localized on surgery or trauma scars. Regression after nicorandil discontinuation was observed in all but two reports and ranged from three days to three months. Characteristics were comparable in our five patient's series. All patients exposed to nicorandil and healthcare practitioners prescribing nicorandil should be aware of the risk of cutaneous ulcerations to enable early diagnosis and drug withdrawal. The risk of misdiagnosis of this serious adverse drug reaction, along with the risk of sequelae, the costs of unnecessary additional investigations and the recent update on nicorandil as second-line treatment for stable angina, with existing alternative drugs, question about the benefit/risk balance of nicorandil.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Nicorandil and cutaneous ulcerations, their misdiagnosis and consequences: Illustration by five cases reports and a review of the French pharmacovigilance database

Archive ouverte | Béné, Johana | CCSD

International audience

Non-hemorrhagic joint disorders and vitamin k antagonists: an under recognized adverse drug reaction?

Archive ouverte | Bene, Johana | CCSD

International audience. Isolated arthralgia, without hemorrhagic side effect, exists and is considered as a very rare adverse drug reaction according to vitamin K antagonists' (VKAs) summary of product characteristi...

Comment on: Failure of rivaroxaban to prevent thrombosis in four patients with anti-phospholipid syndrome

Archive ouverte | Scanvion, Quentin | CCSD

International audience. Additional data suggest that rivaroxaban does not seem to be efficient in all APS patients.

Chargement des enrichissements...