Management of patients suffering from mild traumatic brain injury 2023.

Archive ouverte

Gil-Jardine, Cedric | Payen, Jean-François | Bernard, Rémy | Bobbia, Xavier | Bouzat, Pierre | Catoire, Pierre | Chauvin, Anthony | Claessens, Yann-Erick | Douay, Bénédicte | Dubucs, Xavier | Galanaud, Damien | Gauss, Tobias | Gauvrit, Jean-Yves | Geeraerts, Thomas | Glize, Bertrand | Goddet, Sybille | Godier, Anne | Le Borgne, Pierrick | Rousseau, Geoffroy | Sapin, Vincent | Velly, Lionel | Viglino, Damien | Vigue, Bernard | Cuvillon, Philippe | Frasca, Denis | Claret, Pierre-Géraud

Edité par CCSD ; Elsevier Masson -

International audience. To develop a multidisciplinary French reference that addresses initial pre- and in-hospital management of a mild traumatic brain injury patient. A panel of 22 experts was formed on request from the French Society of Emergency Medicine (SFMU) and the French Society of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (SFAR). A policy of declaration and monitoring of links of interest was applied and respected throughout the process of producing the guidelines. Similarly, no funding was received from any company marketing a health product (drug or medical device). The expert panel had to respect and follow the Grade® (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology to evaluate the quality of the evidence on which the recommendations were based. Given the impossibility of obtaining a high level of evidence for most of the recommendations, it was decided to adopt a "Recommendations for Professional Practice" (RPP) format, rather than a Formalized Expert Recommendation (FER) format, and to formulate the recommendations using the terminology of the SFMU and SFAR Guidelines. Three fields were defined: 1) pre-hospital assessment, 2) emergency room management, and 3) emergency room discharge modalities. The group assessed 11 questions related to mild traumatic brain injury. Each question was formulated using a PICO (Patients Intervention Comparison Outcome) format. The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE® method resulted in the formulation of 14 recommendations. After two rounds of rating, strong agreement was obtained for all recommendations. For one question, no recommendation could be made. There was strong agreement among the experts on important, transdisciplinary recommendations, the purpose of which is to improve management practices for patients with mild head injury.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Management of patients suffering from mild traumatic brain injury 2023

Archive ouverte | Gil-Jardiné, Cédric | CCSD

International audience

Intracranial pressure monitoring with and without brain tissue oxygen pressure monitoring for severe traumatic brain injury in France (OXY-TC): an open-label, randomised controlled superiority trial

Archive ouverte | Payen, Jean-François | CCSD

International audience. Background: Optimisation of brain oxygenation might improve neurological outcome after traumatic brain injury. The OXY-TC trial explored the superiority of a strategy combining intracranial p...

Guidelines: Anaesthesia in the context of COVID-19 pandemic

Archive ouverte | Velly, Lionel | CCSD

International audience. Objectives: The world is currently facing an unprecedented healthcare crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of these guidelines is to produce a framework to facilitate the par...

Chargement des enrichissements...