Benchmarking of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy: European multicentre study

Archive ouverte

Giani, Alessandro | van Ramshorst, Tess | Mazzola, Michele | Bassi, Claudio | Esposito, Alessandro | de Pastena, Matteo | Edwin, Bjørn | Sahakyan, Mushegh | Kleive, Dyre | Jah, Asif | van Laarhoven, Stijn | Boggi, Ugo | Kauffman, Emanuele Federico | Casadei, Riccardo | Ricci, Claudio | Dokmak, Safi | Ftériche, Fadhel Samir | White, Steven | Kamarajah, Sivesh | Butturini, Giovanni | Frigerio, Isabella | Zerbi, Alessandro | Capretti, Giovanni | Pando, Elizabeth | Sutcliffe, Robert | Marudanayagam, Ravi | Fusai, Giuseppe Kito | Fabre, Jean Michel | Björnsson, Bergthor | Timmermann, Lea | Soonawalla, Zahir | Burdio, Fernando | Keck, Tobias | Hackert, Thilo | Groot Koerkamp, Bas | d'Hondt, Mathieu | Coratti, Andrea | Pessaux, Patrick | Pietrabissa, Andrea | Al-Sarireh, Bilal | Marino, Marco | Molenaar, Quintus | Yip, Vincent | Besselink, Marc | Ferrari, Giovanni | Hilal, Mohammad Abu

Edité par CCSD ; Wiley -

International audience. Background: Benchmarking is the process to used assess the best achievable results and compare outcomes with that standard. This study aimed to assess best achievable outcomes in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (MIDPS).Methods: This retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing MIDPS for any indication, between 2003 and 2019, in 31 European centres. Benchmarks of the main clinical outcomes were calculated according to the Achievable Benchmark of Care (ABC™) method. After identifying independent risk factors for severe morbidity and conversion, risk-adjusted ABCs were calculated for each subgroup of patients at risk.Results: A total of 1595 patients were included. The ABC was 2.5 per cent for conversion and 8.4 per cent for severe morbidity. ABC values were 160 min for duration of operation time, 8.3 per cent for POPF, 1.8 per cent for reoperation, and 0 per cent for mortality. Multivariable analysis showed that conversion was associated with male sex (OR 1.48), BMI exceeding 30 kg/m2 (OR 2.42), multivisceral resection (OR 3.04), and laparoscopy (OR 2.24). Increased risk of severe morbidity was associated with ASA fitness grade above II (OR 1.60), multivisceral resection (OR 1.88), and robotic approach (OR 1.87).Conclusion: The benchmark values obtained using the ABC method represent optimal outcomes from best achievable care, including low complication rates and zero mortality. These benchmarks should be used to set standards to improve patient outcomes.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Benchmarking of robotic and laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy by using two different methods

Archive ouverte | van Ramshorst, Tess M E | CCSD

International audience. Benchmarking is an important tool for quality comparison and improvement. However, no benchmark values are available for minimally invasive spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, either lap...

Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: An International, Retrospective, Cohort Study

Archive ouverte | Chen, Jeffrey W. | CCSD

Robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RDP) is increasingly used as an alternative to laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer but comparative multicenter studies confirming the safety ...

Short-Term Outcomes After Spleen-Preserving Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy With or Without Preservation of Splenic Vessels. Short-Term Outcomes After Spleen-Preserving Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy With or Without Preservation of Splenic Vessels: A Pan-European Retrospective Study in High-Volume Centers

Archive ouverte | Korrel, Maarten | CCSD

International audience. OBJECTIVE: To compare short-term clinical outcomes after Kimura and Warshaw minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP). BACKGROUND: Spleen preservation during distal pancreatectomy can b...

Chargement des enrichissements...