Comprehensive Genome Profiling in Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Precision Medicine Phase II Randomized SAFIR02-Lung Trial

Archive ouverte

Boyault, Sandrine | Attignon, Valery | Soubeyran, Isabelle | Morel, Alain | Tran-Dien, Alicia | Jacquet, Alexandra | Dall'Olio, Filippo Gustavo | Jimenez, Marta | Soria, Jean-Charles | Besse, Benjamin | Barlesi, Fabrice | Tomasini, Pascale | Karimi, Maryam | Michiels, Stefan | Raimbourg, Judith | Daniel, Catherine | Janicot, Henri | Madroszyk, Anne | Audigier-Valette, Clarisse | Quoix, Elisabeth | Mazieres, Julien | Moro-Sibilot, Denis | Dansin, Eric | Molinier, Olivier | Morel, Hugues | Pichon, Eric | Cortot, Alexis | Otto, Josiane | Chomy, Francois | Souquet, Pierre-Jean | Cloarec, Nicolas | Giroux-Leprieur, Etienne | Bieche, Ivan | Lacroix, Ludovic

Edité par CCSD ; American Association for Cancer Research -

International audience. Purpose: Targeted therapies (TT) and immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) have revolutionized the approach to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment in the era of precision medicine. Their impact as switch maintenance therapy based on molecular characterization is unknown.Patients and Methods: SAFIR02-Lung was an open-label, randomized, phase II trial, involving 33 centers in France. We investigated eight TT (substudy-1) and one ICB (substudy-2), compared with standard-of-care as a maintenance strategy in patients with advanced EGFR, ALK wild-type (wt) NSCLC without progression after first-line chemotherapy, based on high-throughput genome analysis. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS).Results: Among the 175 patients randomized in substudy-1, 116 received TT (selumetinib, vistusertib, capivasertib, AZD4547, AZD8931, vandetanib, olaparib, savolitinib) and 59 standard-of-care. Median PFS was 2.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.6-2.9] with TT versus 2.7 months (1.6-4.1) with standard-of-care (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.7-1.36; P = 0.87). There were no significant differences in PFS within any molecular subgroup. In substudy-2, 183 patients were randomized, 121 received durvalumab and 62 standard-of-care. Median PFS was 3.0 months (2.3-4.4) with durvalumab versus 3.0 months (2.0-5.1) with standard-of-care (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.62-1.20; P = 0.38). Preplanned subgroup analysis showed an enhanced benefit with durvalumab in patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) >= 1%, (n = 29; HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11-0.75) as compared with PD-L1 < 1% (n = 31; HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.31-1.60; P-interaction = 0.036). Conclusions: Molecular profiling can feasibly be implemented to guide treatment choice for the maintenance strategy in EGFR/ALK wt NSCLC; in this study it did not lead to substantial treatment benefits beyond durvalumab for PD-L1 >= 1 patients.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Molecular profiling of non-small-cell lung cancer patients with or without brain metastases included in the randomized SAFIR02-LUNG trial and association with intracranial outcome

Archive ouverte | Mogenet, Alice | CCSD

International audience. Lung cancer remains the most frequent cause of brain metastases (BMs) and is responsible for high morbidity and mortality. Intracranial response to systemic treatments is inconsistent due to ...

Genomics to select treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer

Archive ouverte | Andre, Fabrice | CCSD

International audience

Switch maintenance chemotherapy versus observation after carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel doublet chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer: IFCT-1201 MODEL trial

Archive ouverte | Quoix, Elisabeth | CCSD

International audience. Purpose: Maintenance chemotherapy is a reasonable choice for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) not progressing after induction therapy with a platinum-based doubl...

Chargement des enrichissements...