Management of Pathogenic CDH1 Variant Carriers Within the FREGAT Network

Archive ouverte

Bres, Capucine | Voron, Thibault | Benhaim, Leonor | Bergeat, Damien | Parc, Yann | Karoui, Mehdi | Genser, Laurent | Péré, Guillaume | Demma, Jonathan | Bacoeur-Ouzillou, Ophélie | Lebreton, Gil | Thereaux, Jeremie | Gronnier, Caroline | Dartigues, Peggy | Svrcek, Magali | Bouzillé, Guillaume | Bardier, Armelle | Brunac, Anne | Roche, Brigitte | Darcha, Claude | Bazille, Celine | Doucet, Laurent | Belleannee, Genevieve | Lejeune, Sophie | Buisine, Marie | Renaud, Florence | Nuytens, Frederiek | Benusiglio, Patrick | Veziant, Julie | Eveno, Clarisse | Piessen, Guillaume

Edité par CCSD ; Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins -

International audience. Objective: To describe the management of pathogenic CDH1 variant carriers (pCDH1vc) within the FREGAT (FRench Eso-GAsTric tumor) network. Primary objective focused on clinical outcomes and pathological findings, Secondary objective was to identify risk factor predicting postoperative morbidity (POM).Background: Prophylactic total gastrectomy (PTG) remains the recommended option for gastric cancer risk management in pCDH1vc with, however, endoscopic surveillance as an alternative.Methods: A retrospective observational multicenter study was carried out between 2003 and 2021. Data were reported as median (interquartile range) or as counts (proportion). Usual tests were used for univariate analysis. Risk factors of overall and severe POM (ie, Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or more) were identified with a binary logistic regression.Results: A total of 99 patients including 14 index cases were reported from 11 centers. Median survival among index cases was 12.0 (7.6-16.4) months with most of them having peritoneal carcinomatosis at diagnosis (71.4%). Among the remaining 85 patients, 77 underwent a PTG [median age=34.6 (23.7-46.2), American Society of Anesthesiologists score 1: 75%] mostly via a minimally invasive approach (51.9%). POM rate was 37.7% including 20.8% of severe POM, with age 40 years and above and low-volume centers as predictors ( P =0.030 and 0.038). After PTG, the cancer rate on specimen was 54.5% (n=42, all pT1a) of which 59.5% had no cancer detected on preoperative endoscopy (n=25).Conclusions: Among pCDH1vc, index cases carry a dismal prognosis. The risk of cancer among patients undergoing PTG remained high and unpredictable and has to be balanced with the morbidity and functional consequence of PTG.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Total Versus Subtotal Gastrectomy for Distal Gastric Poorly Cohesive Carcinoma

Archive ouverte | Boubaddi, Mehdi | CCSD

International audience

Prognostic impact of positive microscopic margins (R1 resection) in patients with GIST (gastrointestinal stromal tumours): Results of a multicenter European study

Archive ouverte | Thibaut, Flore | CCSD

International audience. BackgroundAlthough several prognostic factors in GIST have been well studied such as tumour size, mitotic rate, or localization, the influence of microscopic margins or R1 resection remains c...

Limited Resection Versus Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors? Enucleation Interferes in the Debate: A European Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Archive ouverte | Dubois, Clément | CCSD

International audience

Chargement des enrichissements...