0 avis
Endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway involvement in local and remote myocardial ischemic conditioning.
Archive ouverte
Edité par CCSD -
International audience.
Remote ischemic perconditioning (RIPer) and local ischemic postconditioning (IPost) are promising methods to decrease ischemia-reperfusion injury. We tested whether these two methods were effective in reducing infarct size through activation of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response, a potential survival pathway. Rats exposed to myocardial ischemia-reperfusion were allocated to one of six groups: control, no intervention at myocardial reperfusion; IPost, three cycles of 10-s coronary artery occlusion followed by 10-s reperfusion applied at the onset of myocardial reperfusion; RIPer, 10-min limb ischemia followed by 10-min reperfusion initiated during coronary artery occlusion; control + 4-PBA, injection of ER stress inhibitor 4-phenylbutyrate (4-PBA) 1 h before coronary occlusion; IPost + 4-PBA; and RIPer + 4-PBA. Infarct size was significantly reduced in IPost and RIPer groups (33.32% ± 3.65% and 21.86% ± 3.98%, respectively) compared with the control group (54.86% ± 6.01%, P < 0.05). Western blot analysis of GRP78 (glucose-regulated protein) level and cleaved activating transcription factor 6, two ER stress markers, demonstrated an enhancement of ER stress response in IPost group but not in RIPer group at 15-min reperfusion. Furthermore, 4-PBA abolished cardioprotection induced by IPost (infarct size 53.75 ± 3.49 vs. 33.32 ± 3.65%, P < 0.05) but not by RIPer (28.80 ± 10.45% vs. 21.86 ± 3.98%, not statistically significant). GRP78 and cleaved activating transcription factor 6 levels were no longer increased in IPost group after 4-PBA. These findings point to a role for ER stress response in cardioprotection against reperfusion injury in IPost but not RIPer, suggesting differences in cardioprotective mechanisms between local and remote conditioning.
Consulter en ligne
Suggestions
Du même auteur
