Identifying how GPs spend their time and the obstacles they face: a mixed-methods study

Archive ouverte

Sinnott, Carol | Moxey, Jordan M | Marjanovic, Sonja | Leach, Brandi | Hocking, Lucy | Ball, Sarah | Georgiadis, Alexandros | Lamé, Guillaume | Willars, Janet | Dixon-Woods, Mary

Edité par CCSD ; Royal College of General Practitioners -

International audience. Background: Although problems that impair task completion — known as operational failures — are an important focus of concern in primary care, they have remained little studied.Aim: To quantify the time GPs spend on different activities during clinical sessions; to identify the number of operational failures they encounter; and to characterise the nature of operational failures and their impact for GPs.Design and setting: Mixed-method triangulation study with 61 GPs in 28 NHS general practices in England from December 2018 to December 2019.Method: Time–motion methods, ethnographic observations, and interviews were used.Results: Time–motion data on 7679 GP tasks during 238 hours of practice in 61 clinical sessions suggested that operational failures were responsible for around 5.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.5% to 5.4%) of all tasks undertaken by GPs and accounted for 3.9% (95% CI = 3.2% to 4.5%) of clinical time. However, qualitative data showed that time–motion methods, which depend on pre-programmed categories, substantially underestimated operational failures. Qualitative data also enabled further characterisation of operational failures, extending beyond those measured directly in the time–motion data (for example, interruptions, deficits in equipment/supplies, and technology) to include problems linked to GPs’ coordination role and weaknesses in work systems and processes. The impacts of operational failures were highly consequential for GPs’ experiences of work.Conclusion: GPs experience frequent operational failures, disrupting patient care, impairing experiences of work, and imposing burden in an already pressurised system. This better understanding of the nature and impact of operational failures allows for identification of targets for improvement and indicates the need for coordinated action to support GPs.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Why is safety in intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring so hard? A qualitative study combining human factors/ergonomics and social science analysis

Archive ouverte | Lamé, Guillaume | CCSD

International audience. Background: Problems in intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring with cardiotocography (CTG) remain a major area of preventable harm. Poor understanding of the influences on safety may have hi...

What can Safety Cases offer for patient safety? A multisite case study

Archive ouverte | Liberati, Elisa, Giulia | CCSD

International audience. Background The Safety Case is a regulatory technique that requires organisations to demonstrate to regulators that they have systematically identified hazards in their systems and reduced ris...

Improving care for patients with Clostridioides difficile infection: A clinical practice and healthcare systems perspective

Archive ouverte | Hocking, Lucy | CCSD

International audience. Introduction Arriving at a C. difficile infection (CDI) diagnosis, treating patients and dealing with recurrences is not straightforward, but a comprehensive and well-rounded understanding of...

Chargement des enrichissements...