A Protocol for the Use of Case Reports/Studies and Case Series in Systematic Reviews for Clinical Toxicology

Archive ouverte

Nambiema, Aboubakari | Sembajwe, Grace | Lam, Juleen | Woodruff, Tracey | Mandrioli, Daniele | Chartres, Nicholas | Fadel, Marc | Le Guillou, Adrien | Valter, Remi | Deguigne, Marie | Legeay, Marion | Bruneau, Chloe | Le Roux, Gaël | Descatha, Alexis

Edité par CCSD ; Frontiers media -

International audience. Introduction: Systematic reviews are routinely used to synthesize current science and evaluate the evidential strength and quality of resulting recommendations. For specific events, such as rare acute poisonings or preliminary reports of new drugs, we posit that case reports/studies and case series (human subjects research with no control group) may provide important evidence for systematic reviews. Our aim, therefore, is to present a protocol that uses rigorous selection criteria, to distinguish high quality case reports/studies and case series for inclusion in systematic reviews. Methods: This protocol will adapt the existing Navigation Guide methodology for specific inclusion of case studies. The usual procedure for systematic reviews will be followed. Case reports/studies and case series will be specified in the search strategy and included in separate sections. Data from these sources will be extracted and where possible, quantitatively synthesized. Criteria for integrating cases reports/studies and case series into the overall body of evidence are that these studies will need to be well-documented, scientifically rigorous, and follow ethical practices. The instructions and standards for evaluating risk of bias will be based on the Navigation Guide. The risk of bias, quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations will be assessed by two independent review teams that are blinded to each other. Conclusion: This is a protocol specified for systematic reviews that use case reports/studies and case series to evaluate the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in disciplines like clinical toxicology, where case reports/studies are the norm.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Assessing the quality of evidence in studies estimating prevalence of exposure to occupational risk factors: The QoE-SPEO approach applied in the systematic reviews from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related burden of disease and Injury

Archive ouverte | Pega, Frank | CCSD

International audience. Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Labour Organization (ILO) have produced the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury (WHO...

Comparison of different estimators of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic activity on geographical and temporal levels

Archive ouverte | Valter, Remi | CCSD

International audience. Background: Studies began investigating occupational exposures as a source of contamination to SARS-CoV-2, yet few considered the variation in SARS-Cov2 pandemic activity for these exposures....

Comment on: amanitin intoxication

Archive ouverte | Cellier, Morgane | CCSD

International audience

Chargement des enrichissements...