Screening for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR: Saliva or nasopharyngeal swab? Rapid review and meta-analysis

Archive ouverte

Ibrahimi, Nusaïbah | Delaunay-Moisan, Agnès | Hill, Catherine | Le Teuff, Gwénaël | Rupprecht, Jean-François | Thuret, Jean-Yves | Chaltiel, Dan | Potier, Marie-Claude

Edité par CCSD ; Public Library of Science -

International audience. Background: Diagnosis of COVID-19 in symptomatic patients and screening of populations for SARS-CoV-2 infection require access to straightforward, low-cost and high-throughput testing. The recommended nasopharyngeal swab tests are limited by the need of trained professionals and specific consumables and this procedure is poorly accepted as a screening method In contrast, saliva sampling can be self-administered.Methods: In order to compare saliva and nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, we designed a meta-analysis searching in PubMed up to December 29th, 2020 with the key words “(SARS-CoV-2 OR COVID-19 OR COVID19) AND (salivary OR saliva OR oral fluid)) NOT (review[Publication Type]) NOT (PrePrint[Publication Type])” applying the following criteria: records published in peer reviewed scientific journals, in English, with at least 15 nasopharyngeal/orapharyngeal swabs and saliva paired samples tested by RT-PCR, studies with available raw data including numbers of positive and negative tests with the two sampling methods. For all studies, concordance and sensitivity were calculated and then pooled in a random-effects model.Findings: A total of 377 studies were retrieved, of which 50 were eligible, reporting on 16,473 pairs of nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal and saliva samples. Meta-analysis showed high concordance, 92.5% (95%CI: 89.5–94.7), across studies and pooled sensitivities of 86.5% (95%CI: 83.4–89.1) and 92.0% (95%CI: 89.1–94.2) from saliva and nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs respectively. Heterogeneity across studies was 72.0% for saliva and 85.0% for nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs.Interpretation: Our meta-analysis strongly suggests that saliva could be used for frequent testing of COVID-19 patients and “en masse” screening of populations.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

The Importance Of Naturally Attenuated Sars-Cov-2 In The Fight Against Covid-19

Archive ouverte | Armengaud, J. | CCSD

\ₑprint: https://sfamjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1462-2920.15039. International audience. The current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is wreaking havoc throughout the world and has rapidly become a global h...

Information needs on nutrition in link to cancer prevention among cancer patients, high-risk individuals and general population – A national cross-sectional study

Archive ouverte | Veron, L. | CCSD

International audience. Background & aims:Nutrition is one of the fundamentals of cancer prevention. Knowing what are the patients’ needs and beliefs in terms of “nutrition and cancer” information helps tailor futur...

PNNS-GS2: Development and validation of a dietary quality score reflecting the French nutritional recommendations of 2017

Archive ouverte | Chaltiel, Dan | CCSD

International audience

Chargement des enrichissements...