Baseline predictors for visual acuity loss during observation in diabetic macular oedema with good baseline visual acuity

Archive ouverte

Busch, Catharina | Okada, Mali | Zur, Dinah | Fraser‐bell, Samantha | Rodríguez‐valdés, Patricio | Cebeci, Zafer | Lupidi, Marco | Fung, Adrian | Gabrielle, Pierre‐henry | Giancipoli, Ermete | Chaikitmongkol, Voraporn | Laíns, Inês | Santos, Ana Rita | Kunavisarut, Paradee | Sala‐puigdollers, Anna | Chhablani, Jay | Ozimek, Malgorzata | Hilely, Assaf | Degenhardt, Valentin | Loewenstein, Anat | Iglicki, Matias | Rehak, Matus

Edité par CCSD -

International audience. Purpose: To investigate clinical baseline characteristics and optical coherence tomography biomarkers predicting visual loss during observation in eyes with diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and good baseline visual acuity (VA). Methods: A sub-analysis of a 12-month, retrospective study, including patients with baseline VA ≤0.1 logMAR (≥20/25 Snellen) and centre-involving DMO. The primary outcome measure was the correlation between baseline characteristics and VA loss ≥10 letters during follow-up. Results: A total of 249 eyes were included in the initial study, of which 147 eyes were observed and 80 eyes received anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment at baseline. Visual acuity (VA) loss ≥10 letters occurred in 21.8% (observed cohort) and in 24.3% (treated cohort), respectively. Within observed eyes, presence of hyperreflective foci [HRF; odds ratio (OR): 3.18, p = 0.046], and disorganization of inner retina layers (DRIL; OR: 2.71, p = 0.026) were associated with a higher risk of VA loss ≥10 letters. In observed eyes with a combined presence of HRF, DRIL and ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption, the risk of VA loss was further increased (OR: 3.86, p = 0.034). In eyes with combined presence of DRIL, HRF and EZ disruption, risk of VA loss was 46.7% (7/15 eyes) in the observed cohort, and 26.3% (5/19 eyes) in the treated cohort (p = 0.26). Conclusion: Patients with DMO and good baseline VA, managed by observation, are of increased risk for VA loss if DRIL, HRF and EZ disruption are present at baseline. Earlier treatment with anti-VEGF in these patients may potentially decrease the risk of VA loss at 12 months.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Real-world outcomes of observation and treatment in diabetic macular edema with very good visual acuity: the OBTAIN study

Archive ouverte | Busch, Catharina | CCSD

International audience. To describe and compare the functional and anatomical outcomes of untreated and treated diabetic macular edema (DME) in eyes with very good baseline visual acuity (VA) in a real-world setting...

Real-world outcomes of non-responding diabetic macular edema treated with continued anti-VEGF therapy versus early switch to dexamethasone implant: 2-year results

Archive ouverte | Busch, Catharina | CCSD

Supplementary material.Part of the following topical collections: Eye Complications of Diabetes https://link.springer.com/journal/592/topicalCollection/AC_e856c0f49475c3b4ef0bb3dc0f1b780b. Supplementary material: https://static-co...

Shall we stay, or shall we switch? Continued anti-VEGF therapy versus early switch to dexamethasone implant in refractory diabetic macular edema

Archive ouverte | Busch, Catharina | CCSD

International audience. To compare functional and anatomical outcomes of continued anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy versus dexamethasone (DEX) implant in eyes with refractory diabetic macular e...

Chargement des enrichissements...