Ranibizumab or Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema: One-Year Comparison of Real-World Outcomes from Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry

Archive ouverte

Bhandari, Sanjeeb | Nguyen, Vuong | Fraser-Bell, Samantha | Mehta, Hemal | Viola, Francesco | Baudin, Florian | Gabrielle, Pierre-Henry | Creuzot-Garcher, Catherine | Gillies, Mark C. | Barthelmes, Daniel

Edité par CCSD -

International audience. Purpose : To compare the 12 months treatment outcomes of ranibizumab and aflibercept for diabetic macular edema (DME) in routine clinical practice.Methods : This was a retrospective analysis of data from a prospectively designed observational registry: the Fight Retinal Blindness! Project. Treatment-naïve eyes that started either ranibizumab (0.5mg) or aflibercept (2mg) for DME from 1 December 2013 to 1 June 2018 were identified. The primary outcome was the mean change in visual acuity (VA in logMAR letters) from baseline to 12 months.Results : We identified 383 eyes (Ranibizumab – 166, Aflibercept – 217) of 291 patients. Eyes of patients in the aflibercept group had a lower mean VA (mean difference [MD] -3.1 letters) and a thicker maculae (MD +26μm) than those of ranibizumab at baseline which was not significantly different (Table 1). Patients on ranibizumab were older (MD +2.7 years). The adjusted MD in VA change and central subfield thickness (CST) reduction were +1 letter (1.4 for aflibercept versus 0.4 for ranibizumab, p=0.4) and -30 microns (-85 versus -55, p<0.01) in eyes with initial VA ≥20/40 and +3 letters (10.6 versus 7.6, p<0.01) and -46 microns (-148 versus -102, p<0.02) in those presenting with VA ≤20/50. Eyes in the aflibercept group received more injections over 12 months, median (Q1, Q3) of 8 (6, 9), than the ranibizumab group, 6 (4, 8), though this difference was not significant (p=0.13). Treatment switches, albeit low, were more frequent from ranibizumab to aflibercept than vice versa. Significantly more eyes in the aflibercept group were lost to follow-up within 12 months (21% versus 9% ranibizumab, P<0.01).Conclusions : Both drugs were beneficial for DME (Figure 1). Aflibercept-treated eyes, which had borderline worse vision and thicker maculae at baseline, had larger reductions in CST after 12 months of treatment. Larger gains in VA was observed with aflibercept treatment when the initial VA was ≤20/50.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Ranibizumab or aflibercept for diabetic macular edema: Comparison of 1-year outcomes from the fight retinal blindness! Registry

Archive ouverte | Bhandari, Sanjeeb | CCSD

Supplemental material available at www.aaojournal.org.. International audience. PURPOSE: Both ranibizumab and aflibercept improved vision and decreased macular thickness in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) in ...

Twelve-month outcomes of ranibizumab versus aflibercept for macular oedema in branch retinal vein occlusion: data from the FRB! registry

Archive ouverte | Hunt, Adrian | CCSD

International audience. BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the efficacy of ranibizumab (0.5 mg) with aflibercept (2 mg) in the treatment of cystoid macular oedema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) over 12 months....

12-month outcomes of ranibizumab versus aflibercept for macular oedema in central retinal vein occlusion: data from the FRB! registry

Archive ouverte | Niedzwiecki, Mateusz | CCSD

International audience. PURPOSE: To compare 12-month treatment outcomes of eyes receiving aflibercept or ranibizumab for macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in routine clinical practice...

Chargement des enrichissements...