Impact of the New MELD-based Allocation System on Waiting List and Post-Transplant Survival - A Cohort Analysis Using the French National CRISTAL Database

Archive ouverte

Jasseron, Carine | Francoz, Claire | Antoine, Corinne | Legeai, Camille | Durand, François | Dharancy, Sébastien | Jacquelinet, Christan | Azoulay, Daniel | Duvoux, Christophe | Scatton, Olivier | Calmus, Yvon | Cherqui, Daniel | Samuel, Didier | Soubrane, Olivier | Mabrut, Jean-Yves | Dumortier, Jérôme | Letoublon, Christian | Leroy, Vincent | Pezet, Denis | Abergel, Armand | Iannelli, Antonio | Anty, Rodolphe | Navarro, Francis | Pageaux, Georges | Pruvot, François-René | Bachellier, Philippe | Besh, Camille | Mantion, Georges | Di Martino, Vincent | Kamar, Nassim | Muscari, Fabrice | Chiche, Laurence | Neau Cransac, Martine | Boudjema, Karim | Houssel Debry, Pauline | Salame, Ephrem

Edité par CCSD ; Frontiers Media -

International audience. Concerns related to equity and efficacy of our previous center-based allocation system have led us to introduce a patient-based allocation system called the "Liver Score" that incorporates the MELD score. The main objective of this study was to compare waitlist and post-transplant survivals before and after implementation of the "Liver Score" using the French transplant registry (period before: 2004-2006 and period after: 2007-2012). Patients transplanted during the second period were sicker and had a higher MELD. One-year waitlist survival (74% versus 76%; p=0.8) and one-year post-transplant survival (86.3% vs 85.7%; p=0.5) were similar between the 2 periods. Cirrhotic recipients with MELD>35 had lower one-year post-transplant survival compared to those with MELD<35 (74.8% vs 86.3%; p<0.01), mainly explained by their higher intubation and renal failure rates. The MELD showed a poor discriminative capacity. In cirrhotic recipients with MELD>35, patients presenting 2 or 3 risk factors (dialysis, intubation or infection) had a lower 1-year survival compared to those with none of these risk factors (61.2% vs 92%; p<0.01). The implementation of the MELD-based allocation system has led to transplant sicker patients with no impact on waitlist and post-transplant survivals. Nevertheless, selection of patients with MELD>35 should be completed to allow safe transplantation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma compared to hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Different survival, similar recurrence

Archive ouverte | Amory, Boris | CCSD

International audience. BackgroundCombined hepatocholangiocarcinoma is a rare cancer with a grim prognosis composed of both hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma morphologic patterns in the sa...

International study on the outcome of locoregional therapy for liver transplant in hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan criteria

Archive ouverte | Degroote, Helena | CCSD

International audience. BACKGROUND and AIMS: Good outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) have been reported after successfully downstaging to Milan criteria in more advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aim...

Comparing indications, complexity and outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection between centers with and without a liver transplant program: a French nationwide study

Archive ouverte | Laroche, Sophie | CCSD

International audience. Background: There are no data to evaluate the difference in populations and impact of centers with liver transplant programs in performing laparoscopic liver resection (LLR).Methods: This was...

Chargement des enrichissements...