Three Rounds of External Quality Assessment in France to Evaluate the Performance of 28 Platforms for Multiparametric Molecular Testing in Metastatic Colorectal and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Archive ouverte

Dequeker, Elisabeth M.C. | Keppens, Cleo | Egelé, Caroline | Delen, Sofie | Lamy, Aude | Lemoine, Antoinette | Sabourin, Jean-Christophe | Andrieu, Catherine | Ligtenberg, Marjolijn | Fetique, Dominique | Tops, Bastiaan | Descarpentries, Clotilde | Blons, Hélène | Denoux, Yves | Aube, Cécile | Penault-Llorca, Frédérique | Hofman, Paul | Leroy, Karen | Le Marechal, Cédric | Doucet, Laurent | Duranton-Tanneur, Valérie | Pedeutour, Florence | Soubeyran, Isabelle | Côté, Jean-François | Emile, Jean-François | Vignaud, Jean-Michel | Monhoven, Nathalie | Haddad, Véronique | Laurent-Puig, Pierre | van Krieken, Han | Nowak, Frédérique | Lonchamp, Etienne | Bellocq, Jean-Pierre | Rouleau, Etienne

Edité par CCSD ; American Society for Investigative Pathology (ASIP) -

International audience. Personalized medicine has gained increasing importance in clinical oncology, and several clinically important biomarkers are implemented in routine practice. In an effort to guarantee high quality of molecular testing in France, three subsequent external quality assessment rounds were organized at the initiative of the National Cancer Institute between 2012 and 2014. The schemes included clinically relevant biomarkers for metastatic colorectal (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, microsatellite instability) and non-small cell lung cancer (EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, ERBB2), and they represent the first multigene/multicancer studies throughout Europe. In total, 56 laboratories coordinated by 28 regional molecular centers participated in the schemes. Laboratories received formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples and were asked to use routine methods for molecular testing to predict patient response to targeted therapies. They were encouraged to return results within 14 calendar days after sample receipt. Both genotyping and reporting were evaluated separately. During the three external quality assessment rounds, mean genotype scores were all above the preset standard of 90% for all biomarkers. Participants were mainly challenged in case of rare insertions or deletions. Assessment of the written reports showed substantial progress between the external quality assessment schemes on multiple criteria. Several essential elements such as the clinical interpretation of test results and the reason for testing still require improvement by continued external quality assessment education.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Performance and cost efficiency of KRAS mutation testing for metastatic colorectal cancer in routine diagnosis: the MOKAECM study, a nationwide experience.

Archive ouverte | Blons, Hélène | CCSD

International audience. PURPOSE: Rapid advances in the understanding of cancer biology have transformed drug development thus leading to the approval of targeted therapies and to the development of molecular tests t...

Results of a worldwide external quality assessment of cfDNA testing in lung Cancer

Archive ouverte | Fairley, Jennifer, A | CCSD

International audience. Background Circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA) testing of plasma for EGFR somatic variants in lung cancer patients is being widely implemented and with any new service, external quality assessm...

Detection of EGFR Variants in Plasma

Archive ouverte | Keppens, Cleo | CCSD

International audience

Chargement des enrichissements...