Comparison of Systolic Period Duration using Aortic Flow or Pressure Based Methods in Anesthetized Patients

Archive ouverte

Le Gall, Arthur | Laurin, Alexandre | Vallée, Fabrice | Chemla, Denis

Edité par CCSD -

International audience. It has been shown that Systolic Period Duration (SPD) measured with trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE) is significantly shorter compared to measurements made with radial arterial pressure waveform. This difference could be interpreted in terms of arterial pressure amplification , a mechanism by which arterial pressure waveform is transformed alongside the arterial tree. This amplification is closely related to cardiac afterload as it shares common determinants, like arterial stiffness, pulse wave velocity, or aortic reflection waves. In turn, afterload estimated partly using arterial pressure amplification is useful during general anesthesia (GA) to evaluate detrimental or beneficial effects of vasopressors given to combat hypotensions. Despite TEE measurements comport some impracticalities, trans-esophageal Doppler (TE Doppler) is routinely used for cardiac output monitoring. The goal of this paper was to compare SPD measured with TE Doppler and with arterial pressure at the same location. A secondary goal was to describe a novel dicrotic notch identification algorithm that uses the interspace between the pressure waveform and the straight line going from the systolic peak of one beat to the foot of the subsequent beat. Twenty three patients undergoing GA for neurointerventional procedures were included. Central pressure was obtained by fluid filled radiologic guidewire connected to a pressure transducer. Flow velocity waveform was obtained using TE Doppler probe inserted in the esophagus after induction of GA. Pressure and flow velocity measurements were recorded simultaneously when the tip of the pressure catheter was placed in front of the Doppler probe, in the descending Aorta. SPD measured from Flow velocity waveform was significantly shorter than from Pressure waveform (343 ± 46 ms vs 415 ± 54 ms; p < 0.001). Flow velocity and Pressure waveform methods are not interchangeable. To measure SPD consistently at different locations, a consistent algorithm should be used, such as automated identification of dicrotic notch.

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Coupling data measured in operating theatre with patient-specific biomechanical model of heart and vessels to augment haemodynamic monitoring of patients undergoing general anaesthesia. Exploitation conjointe d'un modèle biomécanique patient-spécifique de coeur et vaisseaux et de données mesurées au bloc opératoire pour augmenter le monitorage hémodynamique des patients sous anesthésie générale

Archive ouverte | Le Gall, Arthur | CCSD

Haemodynamic evaluation of anaesthetised patients in operating theatre or in intensive care units can be challenging. Indeed, monitoring devices can be inaccurate and/or invasive. Physicians have to evaluate the usefulness of the ...

A biomechanics-based parametrized cardiac end-diastolic pressure–volume relationship for accurate patient-specific calibration and estimation

Archive ouverte | Chapelle, Dominique | CCSD

International audience. A simple power law has been proposed in the pioneering work of Klotz et al. (Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 291(1):H403–H412, 2006) to approximate the end-diastolic pressure–volume relations...

Minimally-invasive estimation of patient-specific end-systolic elastance using a biomechanical heart model

Archive ouverte | Le Gall, Arthur | CCSD

International audience. The end-systolic elastance $(Ees)$-the slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship (ESPVR) at the end of ejection phase-has become a reliable indicator of myocardial functional sta...

Chargement des enrichissements...