Cost-effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: an economic, randomized, prospective, multicenter phase III trial comparing docetaxel and pemetrexed: the GFPC 05-06 study.

Archive ouverte

Vergnenegre, Alain | Corre, Romain | Berard, Henri | Paillotin, Dominique | Dujon, Cecile | Robinet, Gilles | Crequit, Jacky | Bota, Suzanna | Thomas, Pascal | Chouaid, Christos | Renseigné, Non

Edité par CCSD ; Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins -

International audience. BACKGROUND: There are few data on the cost-effectiveness of second-line chemotherapies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objective of this phase III, randomized, multicenter, prospective study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of docetaxel and pemetrexed, two widely used drugs. METHODS: We compared, from a payer's perspective, the directs costs and effectiveness of docetaxel (75 mg/m, arm A) and pemetrexed (500 mg/m, arm B) administered every 3 weeks to NSCLC patients who had progressed after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Monthly health utilities (based on disease states: responding, stable or progressive, and grade 3/4 toxicities) were derived from the literature. Costs were prospectively assessed. RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients were enrolled between February 2006 and June 2008. The patients in the docetaxel and pemetrexed arms had similar clinical characteristics and treatment efficacy (respective objective response rates 10.7% and 12%; median progression-free survival times 2.8 and 2.5 months; median survival times 8.0 and 6.4 months, respectively). Grade 3/4 toxicities were significantly less frequent with pemetrexed (52.0% versus 33.3%, p = 0.02). Docetaxel was associated with lower treatment-period costs (€9709 ± €6272 versus €13,436 ± €6508, p < 0.001). Docetaxel had a more favorable cost-utility ratio than pemetrexed. When compared with best supportive care, the cost-utility was €32,652/quality-adjusted life year for docetaxel and €40,980/quality-adjusted life year for pemetrexed. CONCLUSION: Second-line treatment for NSCLC is more cost-effective with docetaxel than with pemetrexed. Both strategies have acceptable cost-effectiveness ratios compared with commonly used and reimbursed regimens for advanced NSCLC.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Assessment of preoperative noninvasive ventilation before lung cancer surgery: The preOVNI randomized controlled study

Archive ouverte | Tromeur, Cécile | CCSD

International audience

Use of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for the Management of Elderly Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase III Randomized ESOGIA-GFPC-GECP 08-02 Study

Archive ouverte | Corre, Romain | CCSD

International audience. PURPOSE: Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is recommended to assess the vulnerability of elderly patients, but its integration in cancer treatment decision making has never been prospe...

Epidemiology and treatment costs of bone metastases from lung cancer: a French prospective, observational, multicenter study (GFPC 0601).

Archive ouverte | Decroisette, Chantal | CCSD

International audience. INTRODUCTION: The aim of this prospective, observational, multicenter study was to examine the epidemiology and management costs of bone metastatic disease (BMD) in patients with lung cancer....

Chargement des enrichissements...