An interprofessional process for the limitation of life-sustaining treatments in France

Article indépendant

BLYTHE, Jacob A. | KENTISH-BARNES, Nancy | DEBUE, Anne-Sophie | DOHAN, Daniel | AZOULAY, Elie | COVINSKY, Ken | MATTHEWS, Thea | CURTIS, J. Randall | DZENG, Elizabeth

CONTEXT: The provision of potentially non-beneficial life-sustaining treatments (LSTs) remains a challenging problem. In 2005, legislation in France established an interprofessional process by which non-beneficial LSTs could be withheld or withdrawn, permitting exploration of the effects of such a legally-protected process and its implementation. OBJECTIVES: To characterize intensive care unit (ICU) interprofessional team decision-making and consensus-building practices regarding withholding and withdrawing of LSTs in two Parisian hospitals and to explore physician and nurse perceptions of and experiences with these practices. METHODS: This was an exploratory qualitative study utilizing thematic analysis of semi-structured, in-depth interviews of physicians and nurses purposively sampled based on level of training and experience from two hospitals in Paris, France. RESULTS: A total of 25 participants were interviewed. Participants reported that the two Parisian hospitals in this study have each created an interprofessional process for withholding or withdrawing non-beneficial LSTs, providing insight into how norms of decision-making respond to systems-level legal changes. Participants reported that these processes tended to be consistent across several domains: maintaining unified messaging with patients, empowering nurses to participate in end-of-life decision-making, reducing moral distress provoked by end-of-life decisions, and shaping the ethical milieu within which end-of-life decision-making takes place. CONCLUSIONS: The architecture of the interprofessional process created at two Parisian hospitals and its perceived benefits may be useful to clinicians and policy-makers attempting to establish processes, policies, or legislation directed at withholding or withdrawing potentially non-beneficial LSTs in the United States and elsewhere.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392421003997?via%3Dihub

Voir la revue «JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 63»

Autres numéros de la revue «JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT»

• Description
• Sujet/Public
• Outil
• Outil d'anticipation
• Gestion