Organ donation by Maastricht-III pediatric patients : recommendations of the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgences Pédiatriques (GFRUP) and Association des Anesthésistes Réanimateurs Pédiatriques d'Expression Française (ADARPEF) Part I: Ethical considerations and family care

Article indépendant

GAILLARD-LE ROUX, B. | CREMER, R. | SAINT-BLANQUAT, L. de | BEAUX, J. | BLANOT, S. | BONNIN, F. | BORDET, F. | DEHO, A. | DUPONT, S. | KLUSIEWICZ, A. | LAFARGUE, A. | LEMAINS, M. | MERCHAOUI, Z. | QUERE, R. | SAMYN, M. | SAULNIER, M.-L. | TEMPER, L. | MICHEL, F. | DAUGER, S. | GROUPE FRANCOPHONE DE RÉANIMATION ET URGENCES PÉDIATRIQUES (GFRUP) AND ASSOCIATION DES ANESTHÉSISTES-RÉANIMATEURS PÉDIATRIQUES D'EXPRESSION FRANÇAISE

The French Transplant Health Authority (Agence de la Biomédecine) has broadened its organ- and tissue-donation criteria to include pediatric patients whose death is defined by circulatory criteria and after the planned withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (WLST) (Maastricht category III). A panel of pediatric experts convened to translate data in the international literature into recommendations for organ and tissue donation in this patient subgroup. The panel estimated that, among children aged 5 years or over with severe irreversible neurological injury (due to primary neurological injury or post-anoxic brain injury) and no progression to brain death, the number of potential donors, although small, deserves attention. The experts emphasized the importance of adhering strictly to the collegial procedure for deciding to withdraw life support. Once this decision is made, the available data should be used to evaluate whether the patient might be a potential donor, before suggesting organ donation to the parents. This suggestion should be reserved for parents who have unequivocally manifested their acceptance of WLST. The discussion with the parents should include both the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) team under the responsibility of a senior physician and the hospital organ- and tissue-procurement team. All recommendations about family care during the end of life of a child in the PICU must be followed. The course and potential challenges of organ donation in Maastricht-III pediatric patients must be anticipated. The panel of experts recommended strict compliance with French recommendations (by the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgences Pédiatriques) about WLST and providing deep and continuous sedation until circulatory arrest. The experts identified the PICU as the best place to implement life-support discontinuation and emphasized the importance of returning the body to the PICU after organ donation. French law prohibits the transfer of these patients from one hospital to another. A description of the expert-panel recommendations regarding the organization and techniques appropriate for children who die after controlled circulatory arrest (Maastricht III) is published simultaneously in the current issue of this journal..

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2022.06.004

Voir la revue «Archives de pédiatrie»

Autres numéros de la revue «Archives de pédiatrie»

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Organ donation by Maastricht-III pediatric pa...

Article indépendant | GAILLARD-LE ROUX, B. | Archives de pédiatrie

The French Transplant Health Authority (Agence de la Biomédecine) has broadened its organ- and tissue-donation criteria to include pediatric patients whose death is defined by circulatory criteria and after the planned withdrawal ...

Withholding and withdrawing treatment in pedi...

Article indépendant | CREMER, R. | Archives de pédiatrie | n°4 | vol.28

In 2005, the French-speaking task force on pediatric critical and emergency care [Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d’Urgences Pédiatriques (GFRUP)] issued recommendations on withholding and withdrawing treatments in pedi...

Withholding and withdrawing treatment in pedi...

Article indépendant | CREMER, R. | Archives de pédiatrie | n°4 | vol.28

In 2005, the French-speaking task force on pediatric critical and emergency care [Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d’Urgences Pédiatriques (GFRUP)] issued recommendations on withholding and withdrawing treatments in pediatric ...

De la même série

Withholding and withdrawing treatment in pedi...

Article indépendant | CREMER, R. | Archives de pédiatrie | n°4 | vol.28

In 2005, the French-speaking task force on pediatric critical and emergency care [Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d’Urgences Pédiatriques (GFRUP)] issued recommendations on withholding and withdrawing treatments in pediatric ...

Neonatal end-of-life decision-making almost 2...

Article indépendant | BOIZE, P. | Archives de pédiatrie | n°6 | vol.26

Nearly 20 years ago the EURONIC study reported that French neonatologists sometimes deemed it legitimate to terminate the lives of newborn infants when the prognosis appeared extremely poor. Parents were not always informed of the...

Limitation et arrêt des thérapeutiques active...

Article indépendant | VIDAL, M. | Archives de pédiatrie | n°6 | vol.17

La loi Léonetti a donné un cadre légal à la réflexion éthique relative à la réanimation en néonatologie. Cet article présente les résultats d'une étude sur les pratiques professionnelles concernant la fin de vie dans le service de...

Fin de vie de l'enfant et recherche clinique ...

Article indépendant | DAVOUS, Dominique | Archives de pédiatrie | n°3 | vol.14

Le groupe de réflexion et de recherche au sein de l'Espace éthique de l'AP-HP, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, "parents et soignants face à l'éthique en pédiatrie", a écrit des repères pour mener un essai de phase I avec...

Etat des lieux, besoins et ressources en soin...

Article indépendant | LEVERGER, Guy | Archives de pédiatrie | n°6 | vol.13

Les soins aux enfants en fin de vie demandent des ressources particulières. Voici un rapide état des lieux des soins palliatifs pédiatriques en France.

Chargement des enrichissements...