"No escalation of treatment" designations : a multi-institutional exploratory qualitative study

Article indépendant

BATTEN, Jason N. | BLYTHE, Jacob A. | WIETEN, Sarah E. | DZENG, Elizabeth | KRUSE, Katherine E. | COTLER, Miriam P. | PORTER-WILLIAMSON, Karin | KAYSER, Joshua B. | HARMAN, Stephanie M. | MAGNUS, David

BACKGROUND: No Escalation of Treatment (NoET) designations are used in intensive care units internationally to limit treatment for critically ill patients. However, they are the subject of debate in the literature and have not been qualitatively studied. QUESTION: How do physicians understand and perceive NoET designations, especially with regards to their utility and associated challenges? What mechanisms do hospitals provide to facilitate the use of NoET designations? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Qualitative study at seven United States hospitals, employing semi-structured interviews with thirty physicians and review of relevant institutional records (e.g., hospital policies, screenshots of ordering menus in the electronic health record). RESULTS: At all hospitals, participants reported the use of NoET designations, which were understood to mean that providers should withhold new or higher-intensity interventions ("escalations") but not withdraw ongoing interventions. Three hospitals provided a specific mechanism for designating a patient as NoET (e.g., a DNR/Do-Not-Escalate code status order); at the remaining hospitals, a variety of informal methods (e.g., verbal handoffs) were used. We identified five functions of NoET designations: (1) Defining an intermediate point of treatment limitation, (2) Helping physicians navigate pre-arrest clinical decompensations, (3) Helping surrogate decision makers transition toward comfort care, (4) Preventing patient harm from invasive measures, and (5) Conserving critical care resources. Across hospitals, participants reported implementation challenges related to the ambiguity in meaning of NoET designations. INTERPRETATION: Despite ongoing debate, NoET designations are used in a varied sample of hospitals and are perceived as having multiple functions, suggesting they may fulfill an important need in the care of critically ill patients, especially at the end of life. The use of NoET designations can be improved through the implementation of a formal mechanism that encourages consistency across providers and clarifies the meaning of "escalation" for each patient.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2022.08.2211

Voir la revue «Chest»

Autres numéros de la revue «Chest»

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

"No escalation of treatment" designations : a...

Article indépendant | BATTEN, Jason N. | Chest

BACKGROUND: No Escalation of Treatment (NoET) designations are used in intensive care units internationally to limit treatment for critically ill patients. However, they are the subject of debate in the literature and have not bee...

Hospital culture and intensity of end-of-life...

Article | DZENG, Elizabeth | JAMA internal medicine | n°8 | vol.183

IMPORTANCE: There is substantial institutional variability in the intensity of end-of-life care that is not explained by patient preferences. Hospital culture and institutional structures (eg, policies, practices, protocols, resou...

Hospital culture and intensity of end-of-life...

Article indépendant | DZENG, Elizabeth | JAMA internal medicine | n°8 | vol.183

IMPORTANCE: There is substantial institutional variability in the intensity of end-of-life care that is not explained by patient preferences. Hospital culture and institutional structures (eg, policies, practices, protocols, resou...

De la même série

Perceptions of life support and advance care ...

Article indépendant | PATEL, Vishal R. | Chest | n°6 | vol.161

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has presented new challenges surrounding end-of-life planning and has been associated with increased online discussion about life support. RESEARCH QUESTION: How has online communication about adv...

A medical student perspective on physician-as...

Article indépendant | RHEE, John Y. | Chest | n°3 | vol.152

Physician assisted suicide and euthanasia (PAS/E) has been increasingly discussed and debated in the public square, including in professional medical organizations. However, the medical student perspective on the debate has been e...

Decision-making on withholding or withdrawing...

Article indépendant | LOBO, Suzana M. | Chest | n°2 | vol.152

Background: Many critically ill patients who die will do so after a decision has been made to withhold/withdraw life-sustaining therapy. The objective of this study was to document the characteristics of ICU patients with a decisi...

Integrating advance care planning into practi...

Article indépendant | DINGFIELD, Laura E. | Chest | n°6 | vol.151

Advanced respiratory diseases progress over time and often lead to death. As the condition worsens, patients may lose medical decision-making ability. Advance care planning (ACP) is a process in which patients receive information ...

Predictors of time to death after terminal wi...

Article indépendant | COOKE, Colin R. | Chest | n°2 | vol.138

Dans cette étude, les auteurs ont cherché à déterminer les caractéristiques des patients et les processus de soins qui permettent de prédire le temps de la mort après le retrait en phase terminale de la ventilation artificielle. C...

Chargement des enrichissements...