The patient's relationship with the general practitioner before and after advance care planning : pre/post-implementation study

Article indépendant

VAN DER PLAS, Annicka G. M. | SCHELLEKENS, Julia E. A. P. | GLAUDEMANS, Jolien J. | ONWUTEAKA-PHILIPSEN, Bregje D.

Background: General Practitioners (GPs) are central in the care of Dutch older people and in a good position to have Advance Care Planning (ACP) conversations. Interview studies reveal that the doctor-patient relationship is important when initiating ACP conversations and can also be influenced by ACP conversations. We aimed to examine the association between having an ACP conversation and the patient feeling the GP knows him or her and the patient trusting the GP and vice versa. Methods: Implementation of ACP in primary care was evaluated in a pre-and post design. Questionnaires before implementation of ACP and 14 months later were sent to patients aged 75 years or older within 10 GP-practices and 2 care homes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the relationship between ACP conversations during implementation and the patient-GP relationship before implementation. Odds ratios were adjusted for potential confounders. Generalized ordered logistic regression was used to model the relationship between the changes in patient-GP relationship before and after implementation and ACP conversations during implementation. Results: Four hundred fifty-eight patients filled out the pre- and post-test questionnaire. There was no association between the GP knowing the patient and trust in the pre-test and having an ACP conversation during the implementation. For people who had had an ACP conversation at the end of the implementation period their trust remained more often the same or was higher after implementation (trust to provide good care OR 2.93; trust to follow their wishes OR 2.59), compared to patients who did not have an ACP conversation. A reduction in trust was less likely to happen to patients who had an ACP conversation compared to patients who did not have an ACP conversation. Conclusions: Although we have not found evidence for trust as a prerequisite for ACP conversations, this paper shows that ACP conversations can be beneficial for the doctor-patient relationship.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03256-4

Voir la revue «BMC GERIATRICS, 22»

Autres numéros de la revue «BMC GERIATRICS»

• Description
• Sujet/Public
• Outil
• Outil d'anticipation
• Gestion