Perceptions of facilitators and barriers to measuring and improving quality in palliative care programs

Article indépendant

KUCHINAD, Kamini | SHARMA, Ritu | ISENBERG, Sarina R. | HAMAYEL, Nebras Abu Al | WEAVER, Sallie J. | ZHU, Junya | HANNUM, Susan M. | KAMAL, Arif H. | WALLING, Anne M. | LORENZ, Karl A. | AILON, Jonathan | DY, Sydney M.

Objective: To examine perceptions of facilitators and barriers to quality measurement and improvement in palliative care programs and differences by professional and leadership roles. Methods: We surveyed team members in diverse US and Canadian palliative care programs using a validated survey addressing teamwork and communication and constructs for educational support and training, leadership, infrastructure, and prioritization for quality measurement and improvement. We defined key facilitators as constructs rated =4 (agree) and key barriers as those =3 (disagree) on 1 to 5 scales. We conducted multivariable linear regressions for associations between key facilitators and barriers and (1) professional and (2) leadership roles, controlling for key program and respondent factors and clustering by program. Results: We surveyed 103 respondents in 11 programs; 45.6% were physicians and 50% had leadership roles. Key facilitators across sites included teamwork, communication, the implementation climate (or environment), and program focus on quality improvement. Key barriers included educational support and incentives, particularly for quality measurement, and quality improvement infrastructure such as strategies, systems, and skilled staff. In multivariable analyses, perceptions did not differ by leadership role, but physicians and nurse practitioners/nurses/physician assistants rated most constructs statistically significantly more negatively than other team members, especially for quality improvement (6 of the 7 key constructs). Conclusions: Although participants rated quality improvement focus and environment highly, key barriers included lack of infrastructure, especially for quality measurement. Building on these facilitators and measuring and addressing these barriers might help programs enhance palliative care quality initiatives’ acceptability, particularly for physicians and nurses.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049909120916702

Voir la revue «The American journal of hospice and palliative care, 37»

Autres numéros de la revue «The American journal of hospice and palliative care»

• Description
• Sujet/Public
• Outil
• Outil d'anticipation
• Gestion