Autonomy, voluntariness and assisted dying

Article indépendant

COLBURN, Ben

Ethical arguments about assisted dying often focus on whether or not respect for an individual's autonomy gives a reason to offer them an assisted death if they want it. In this paper, I present an argument for legalising assisted dying which appeals to the autonomy of people who don't want to die. Adding that option can transform the nature of someone's choice set, enabling them to pursue other options voluntarily where that would otherwise be harder or impossible. This does not contradict the more familiar arguments for legalising assisted dying based on the autonomy of those who seek to die. But it does suggest that a wider constituency of support for that legislative change might be created by emphasising that one need not be in that position to be benefited by the change.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105720

Voir la revue «Journal of medical ethics»

Autres numéros de la revue «Journal of medical ethics»

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Autonomy, voluntariness and assisted dying

Article indépendant | COLBURN, Ben | Journal of medical ethics

Ethical arguments about assisted dying often focus on whether or not respect for an individual's autonomy gives a reason to offer them an assisted death if they want it. In this paper, I present an argument for legalising assisted...

Disability-based arguments against assisted d...

Article indépendant | COLBURN, Ben | Bioethics

Some of the most common arguments against legalizing assisted dying are based on appealing to the rights of people with disabilities. This article identifies and responds to those arguments, including that people with disabilities...

Disability-based arguments against assisted d...

Article indépendant | COLBURN, Ben | Bioethics

Some of the most common arguments against legalizing assisted dying are based on appealing to the rights of people with disabilities. This article identifies and responds to those arguments, including that people with disabilities...

De la même série

Spanish regulation of euthanasia and physicia...

Article indépendant | VELASCO SANZ, Tamara Raquel | Journal of medical ethics | n°1 | vol.49

In March 2021, the Spanish Congress approved the law regulating euthanasia, that regulates both euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS). In this article, we analyse the Spanish law regulating euthanasia and PAS, comparing ...

Expanded terminal sedation : dangerous waters

Article indépendant | RIISFELDT, Thomas David | Journal of medical ethics | n°4 | vol.49

Gilbertson et al should be commended for their insightful exploration of expanded terminal sedation (ETS)1; however, there are a number of concerns that I will address in this response. I will first better characterise the current...

Implications of extended terminal sedation

Article indépendant | SORUM, Paul Clay | Journal of medical ethics | n°4 | vol.49

Gilbertson, Savulescu, Oakley and Wilkinson propose extending the availability of terminal sedation (TS) to patients with intractable pain and/or suffering who are expected to live more than 2 weeks (hence the designation of exten...

Suffering, existential distress and temporali...

Article indépendant | EMMERICH, Nathan | Journal of medical ethics | n°4 | vol.49

While there is a great deal to agree with in the essay Expanded Terminal Sedation in End-of-Life Care there is, we think, a need to more fully appreciate the humanistic side of both palliative and end-of-life care. Not only does t...

Withholding or withdrawing life support in lo...

Article indépendant | STEFANOU, Maria-Ioanna | Journal of medical ethics | n°1 | vol.48

Purpose: Scarce evidence exists regarding end-of-life decision (EOLD) in neurocritically ill patients. We investigated the factors associated with EOLD making, including the group and individual characteristics of involved healthc...

Chargement des enrichissements...