How end-of-life care was limited during the first 18 months of the covid-19 pandemic : a longitudinal survey study among healthcare providers (the CO-LIVE study)

Article

ZEE, Masha S. | PASMAN, H. Roeline | WITKAMP, Erica | GOOSSENSEN, Anne | KORFAGE, Ida J. | BECQUÉ, Yvonne N. | NIEROP-VAN BAALEN, Corine | VAN DER HEIDE, Agnes | ONWUTEAKA-PHILIPSEN, Bregje D.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the way in which end-of-life care was provided, underwent a lot of changes and therefor different domains of end-of-life care were impacted. The aim of this study is to describe whether health care providers considered end-of-life care (in medical, nursing, psychosocial and spiritual care) limited by the pandemic through the first 18 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, and examine associations with COVID-19 related circumstances of care (e.g. visit restrictions) and health care providers' characteristics. METHODS: A longitudinal survey study among healthcare providers from different healthcare settings who provided end-of-life care during the pandemic's first 18 months. Data of four time periods were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Generalized Estimating Equation. RESULTS: Of the respondents (n = 302) the majority had a nursing background (71.8%) and most worked in a hospital (30.3%). Especially in the first wave end-of-life care in all aspects was limited according to a substantial part of health care providers (between 29.7 and 57.7%). Psychosocial and spiritual care were more limited than medical and nursing care during all time periods. Care being limited according to health care providers was associated with visit restrictions, shortness of personal protective equipment or restrictions in caring for the deceased and decreased over time. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted different aspects of end-of-life care throughout the pandemic's first 18 months. Over the course of the pandemic health care providers seemed to have invented ways to adjust their work in order to minimize the effect of limiting measures. More involvement of health care providers in decision-making may improve the prioritization of measures to deal with crisis situations in care. These reflections highlight priorities during crises and the role healthcare providers could play in maintaining good end-of-life care. This remains relevant in new health crises, where care may differ from what is considered good quality of care.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01514-3

Voir la revue «BMC palliative care, 23»

Autres numéros de la revue «BMC palliative care»

• Description
• Sujet/Public
• Outil
• Outil d'anticipation
• Gestion